Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32997085›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2020

Gingival inflammation, enamel defects, and tooth sensitivity in children with amelogenesis imperfecta: a case-control study.

Camille Quandalle, Adrien Boillot, Benjamin Fournier, Pascal Garrec, Muriel DE LA Dure-Molla, Stephane Kerner

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A UK-based consensus on clinical decision flowcharts for managing childhood amelogenesis imperfecta in the permanent dentition.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Management of Amelogenesis Imperfecta in Childhood: Two Case Reports.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camille QuandalleUniversité de Paris, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France.
Adrien BoillotUniversité de Paris, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France.
Benjamin FournierUniversité de Paris, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4383-7524
Pascal GarrecUniversité de Paris, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France.
Muriel DE LA Dure-MollaUniversité de Paris, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3557-2845
Stephane KernerUniversité de Paris, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4326-6741
Sorbonne Université · FRHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

methodologyGingival conditions and tooth sensitivity of young patients with amelogenesis imperfecta lack in depth studies. This case-control study aimed to compare (1) the gingival inflammation, the presence of enamel defects, and tooth sensitivity in young patients with and without amelogenesis imperfecta and (2) to investigate if any difference exists between subtypes of amelogenesis imperfecta. We compared forty-two participants with amelogenesis imperfecta with forty-two controls matched for age, gender, and the number of examined sites. Based on interview, clinical examination, and intraoral photography, we collected data on periodontal conditions, enamel defects and the presence of tooth sensitivity. Comparison tests were performed to investigate if any difference existed between cases and controls; and among cases, between the different subtypes of amelogenesis imperfecta. We performed a post-hoc analysis for any significant difference observed.

resultsWe observed more gingival inflammation, enamel defects and tooth sensitivity among cases (all p<0.05). Participants with hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta had more gingival inflammation, enamel defects, and tooth sensitivity than patients with the hypoplastic and hypomature subtypes (all p<0.05). After adjustment for dental plaque, gingival inflammation was associated with the presence of amelogenesis imperfecta (OR (95%CI) = 1.14 (1.05; 1.24). p<0.01).

conclusionGingival inflammation, enamel defect and tooth sensitivity are more frequently observed among young patients with amelogenesis imperfecta, and more specifically among children with the hypocalcified subtype.

Indexed as

Amelogenesis ImperfectaCase-Control StudiesChildDental EnamelDentin SensitivityFemaleHumansInflammationMale

Identifiers

PMID32997085
PMCPMC7521421
OpenAlexW3091434814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.