Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32996793›Full record

Observational studyThe Journal of international medical research2020

Super early cranial repair improves the prognosis of patients with craniocerebral injury.

Hong-Sheng Jiang, Yan-Zhou Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Journal of international medical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hong-Sheng JiangDepartment of Fourth Neurosurgery, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei Province, P.R. China.
Yan-Zhou WangDepartment of Fourth Neurosurgery, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei Province, P.R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3204-2099
Cangzhou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCraniocerebral injury has high disability and mortality rates. The timing of cranioplasty has an important impact on patients' prognosis. This study was performed to compare the functional prognosis between super early repair and conventional repair.

methodsThis observational study included 60 patients who underwent cranioplasty after surgical treatment of severe craniocerebral trauma. The patients were divided into two groups according to the time of cranial repair after the surgical treatment of craniocerebral injury: the super early group and the conventional repair group. Sex, age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score, Zubrod performance status (ZPS) score, psychological function score, quality of life score, and complications were recorded.

resultsThe KPS score, ZPS score, psychological function score, and quality of life score were significantly related to the intervention period. Each of these scores had a clear correlation with the performance of super early treatment.

conclusionSuper early cranial repair does not increase the incidence of surgical complications, and it can improve the postoperative KPS, ZPS, and quality of life scores.

Indexed as

Craniocerebral TraumaQuality of LifeHumansPostoperative PeriodPrognosisSkullTreatment Outcomecraniocerebral injurycranioplastyprognosisquality of lifeSuper early cranial repairtraditional therapy

Identifiers

PMID32996793
PMCPMC7536486
OpenAlexW3090645324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.