Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32996607›Full record

Observational studyJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2021

Comparison Between Lung Ultrasound and Computed Tomographic Findings in Patients With COVID-19 Pneumonia.

Agnaldo José Lopes, Thiago Thomaz Mafort, Cláudia Henrique da Costa, Rogério Rufino, Mônica de Cássia Firmida, Kennedy Martins Kirk, Carolina Gianella Cobo, Hanna da Silva Bessa da Costa, Carlos Miguel Brum Queiroz da Cruz, Roberto Mogami

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Thoracic ultrasound: a review of the state-of-the-art.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2024
    Review
  5. Thoracic UltrasONOgraphy Reporting: The TUONO Consensus.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Simplified Lung Ultrasound Examination and Telehealth Feasibility in Early SARS-CoV-2 Infection.Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Agnaldo José LopesPostgraduation Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8598-4878
Thiago Thomaz MafortPostgraduation Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6193-4822
Cláudia Henrique da CostaPostgraduation Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6785-0753
Rogério RufinoPostgraduation Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Mônica de Cássia FirmidaPostgraduation Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Kennedy Martins KirkPostgraduation Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Carolina Gianella CoboDepartment of Radiology, Pedro Ernesto University Hospital, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Hanna da Silva Bessa da CostaDepartment of Radiology, Pedro Ernesto University Hospital, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Carlos Miguel Brum Queiroz da CruzDepartment of Radiology, Pedro Ernesto University Hospital, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Roberto MogamiPostgraduation Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRHospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto · BRUniversity Center Augusto Motta · BR

Funding

Lacrimal Gland Repair Using Progenitor CellsR01EY026202 · NEI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI MAKARENKOVA, HELEN P. · 2016 to 2025
$5.2M
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 302215/2019-0Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro #E-26/010.002124/2019Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro #E-26/202.679/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to describe findings from lung ultrasound (LUS) and computed tomography (CT) in health professionals with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia and to evaluate the associations of the findings of both tests.

methodsThis cross-sectional observational study evaluated 45 health professionals who were initially seen in screening tents and had a diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 as confirmed by a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and lung involvement diagnosed by LUS. Subsequently, these individuals were admitted to the hospital, where chest CT was performed. Aeration scores were obtained for the LUS examinations based on the following findings: more than 2 B-lines, coalescent B-lines, and subpleural consolidations. A subjective assessment of the extent of lung disease on CT was performed on the basis of the percentage of lung parenchyma involvement as follows: 25% or less, 25% to 50%, and greater than 50%.

resultsRegarding LUS signs, more than 2 B-lines, coalescent B-lines, and subpleural consolidations were present in 73.3%, 68.2%, and 24.4% of cases, respectively. The main findings on CT were ground glass opacities, a crazy-paving pattern, and consolidations (66.7%, 20%, and 20% of cases); 17.8% of cases had examinations without abnormalities. Patients with more than 2 B-lines on LUS had more ground glass opacity areas on CT (P = .0007), whereas patients with subpleural consolidations on LUS had more consolidations on CT (P < .0001). In addition, patients with higher LUS aeration scores had more extensive disease on CT (P < .0001).

conclusionsLung ultrasound can detect lung injury even in the presence of normal CT results. There are associations between the abnormalities detected by both methods, and a relationship also exists between LUS aeration scores and the disease extent on CT.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesHumansLungSARS-CoV-2Tomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographycomputed tomographycoronavirus disease 2019COVID-19lung ultrasoundpneumoniasevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Identifiers

PMID32996607
PMCPMC7537266
OpenAlexW3090170757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.