Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32996597›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2020

Robotic rectal cancer surgery: comparative study of the impact of obesity on early outcomes.

O Peacock, T Limvorapitak, C-Y Hu, B K Bednarski, M M Tillman, H Kaur, M W Taggart, A Dasari, E B Holliday, Y N You and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

O PeacockDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1645-4301
T LimvorapitakDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
C-Y HuDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
B K BednarskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8022-2476
M M TillmanDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
H KaurDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
M W TaggartDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
A DasariDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
E B HollidayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Y N YouDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
G J ChangDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9758-5361
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
TRAINING OF ACADEMIC SURGICAL ONCOLOGISTST32CA009599 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Ashley M Holder, Jennifer A. Wargo · 1988 to 2026
$13.2M
Aman TrustNCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009599NCI NIH HHS T32 CA016672The Andrews Family Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of robotic total mesorectal excision (TME) in obese versus non-obese patients. A total of 533 patients, of whom 161 were obese (30·2 per cent) underwent robotic proctectomy during the study interval. Patient obesity was not associated with adverse short-term clinical outcomes after robotic rectal cancer surgery. Indicated in the obese perhaps?

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresAdolescentAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityRectal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32996597
PMCPMC7938826
OpenAlexW3090878137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.