ArticleJournal of anatomy2021
Are endocasts reliable proxies for brains? A 3D quantitative comparison of the extant human brain and endocast.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Atlas of cortical sulcal imprints on Pan endocasts.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
- Postnatal interaction of size and shape in the human endocranium and brain structures.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
- Computational simulation of cranial soft tissue expansion on the cranium during early postnatal growth in humans.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
- Comparative Sulcal Morphology of the Late Miocene Fossil Ape, Rudapithecus hungaricus.American journal of biological anthropology · 2026Article
- Costs of Early Stone Toolmaking cannot Establish the Presence of Know-how Copying.Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- An inclusive anatomical network analysis of human craniocerebral topology.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
- What do brain endocasts tell us? A comparative analysis of the accuracy of sulcal identification by experts and perspectives in palaeoanthropology.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
- From fossils to mind.Communications biology · 2023Review
- Sulci 3D mapping from human cranial endocasts: A powerful tool to study hominin brain evolution.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Endocranial ontogeny and evolution in earlyProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- The genetic basis of neurocranial size and shape across varied lab mouse populations.Journal of anatomy · 2022Article
- Endocranial asymmetry in New World monkeys: a comparative phylogenetic analysis of morphometric data.Brain structure & function · 2022Article
- Ontogenetic and in silico models of spatial-packing in the hypermuscular mouse skull.Journal of anatomy · 2021Article
- Are endocasts reliable proxies for brains? A 3D quantitative comparison of the extant human brain and endocast.Journal of anatomy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endocasts (i.e., replicas of the inner surface of the bony braincase) constitute a critical proxy for qualifying and quantifying variations in brain shape and organization in extinct taxa. In the absence of brain tissues preserved in the fossil record, endocasts provide the only direct evidence of brain evolution. However, debates on whether or not information inferred from the study of endocasts reflects brain shape and organization have polarized discussions in paleoneurology since the earliest descriptions of cerebral imprints in fossil hominin crania. By means of imaging techniques (i.e., MRIs and CT scans) and 3D modelling methods (i.e., surface-based comparisons), we collected consistent morphological (i.e., shape) and structural (i.e., sulci) information on the variation patterns between the brain and the endocast based on a sample of extant human individuals (N = 5) from the 3D clinical image database of the Steve Biko Academic Hospital in Pretoria (South Africa) and the Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière in Paris (France). Surfaces of the brain and endocast of the same individual were segmented from the 3D MRIs and CT images, respectively. Sulcal imprints were automatically detected. We performed a deformation-based shape analysis to compare both the shape and the sulcal pattern of the brain and the endocast. We demonstrated that there is close correspondence in terms of morphology and organization between the brain and the corresponding endocast with the exception of the superior region. By comparatively quantifying the shape and organization of the brain and endocast, this work represents an important reference for paleoneurological studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.