Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32996446›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2020

Financial Costs of the Zanzibar Elimination of Schistosomiasis Transmission Project.

Paola Salari, Thomas Fürst, Stefanie Knopp, David Rollinson, Fatma Kabole, Mohammed I Khamis, Mussa A Omar, Oliver Bacon, Said M Ali, Jürg Utzinger and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Baseline and Impact of First-Year Intervention onTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Paola Salari1Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Thomas Fürst1Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Stefanie Knopp1Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
David Rollinson3Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom.
Fatma Kabole4Neglected Diseases Program, Zanzibar Ministry of Health, Zanzibar, Tanzania.
Mohammed I Khamis4Neglected Diseases Program, Zanzibar Ministry of Health, Zanzibar, Tanzania.
Mussa A Omar5Public Health Laboratory-Ivo de Carneri, Chake Chake, Tanzania.
Oliver Bacon3Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom.
Said M Ali5Public Health Laboratory-Ivo de Carneri, Chake Chake, Tanzania.
Jürg Utzinger1Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Fabrizio Tediosi1Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHNatural History Museum · GBPublic Health Laboratory Ivo de Carneri · TZUniversity of Basel · CHZanzibar University · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We estimated the financial costs of different interventions against urogenital schistosomiasis, implemented by the Zanzibar Elimination of Schistosomiasis Transmission (ZEST) project, on Pemba and Unguja islands, Tanzania. We used available data on project activities, resources used, and costs reported in the accounting information systems of ZEST partners. The costs were estimated for all the activities related to snail control, behavior change interventions, the impact assessment surveys, and management of the whole program. Costs are presented in US$ for the full duration of the ZEST project from 2011/2012 to 2017. The total financial costs of implementing snail control activities over 5 years, excluding the costs for donated Bayluscide, were US$55,796 on Pemba and US$73,581 on Unguja, mainly driven by personnel costs. The total financial costs of implementing behavior change activities were US$109,165 on Pemba and US$155,828 on Unguja, with costs for personnel accounting for 47% on Pemba and 69% on Unguja. Costs of implementing biannual mass drug administration refer to the estimated 2.4 million treatments provided on Pemba over 4 years (2013-2016), and do not include the costs of donated praziquantel. The total cost per provided treatment was, on average, US$0.21. This study showed the value of exploiting administrative data to estimate costs of major global health interventions. It also provides an evidence base for financial costs and main cost drivers of implementing multiple combinations of intervention sets that inform decisions regarding the feasibility and affordability of implementing schistosomiasis control and elimination strategies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthelminticsDisease EradicationHumansIslandsPraziquantelSchistosoma haematobiumSchistosomiasis haematobiaSnailsSurveys and QuestionnairesTanzaniaAnthelminticsPraziquantel

Identifiers

PMID32996446
PMCPMC7695112
OpenAlexW3090622665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.