Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32996390›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2020

Current Procedural Terminology Codes for Medication Therapy Management in Administrative Data.

David R Axon, Chanadda Chinthammit, Jared Tate, Ann M Taylor, Sandra Leal, Matthew Pickering, Heather Black, Terri Warholak, Patrick J Campbell

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Cost-Effectiveness of Medication Therapy Management Program Across Racial and Ethnic Groups Among Medicare Beneficiaries.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David R AxonDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.
Chanadda ChinthammitDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.
Jared TateDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.
Ann M TaylorDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.
Sandra LealTabula Rasa HealthCare, Tucson, Arizona.
Matthew PickeringQuality Measurement Research & Quality Strategies, Pharmacy Quality Alliance, Alexandria, Virginia.
Heather BlackOutcomes Research, Merck & Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey.
Terri WarholakDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.
Patrick J CampbellDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.
University of Arizona · USSouthern Arizona VA Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThree pharmacist-specific Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes exist to facilitate medication therapy management (MTM) reimbursement (codes 99605, 99606, and 99607). However, no studies have used CPT codes in administrative claims databases to identify subjects who have received MTM services.

objectiveTo assess the prevalence of MTM services provided, using CPT codes identified in an administrative dataset.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using a subset of Medicare Part D individuals from the IBM MarketScan Medicare Supplemental Research Databases (2009-2015). Researchers identified beneficiaries who received MTM services using CPT codes 99605, 99606, and 99607.

resultsOf the 16,483,709 individuals in the dataset, only 3,291 had CPT codes indicating that they received MTM services, representing an overall prevalence of 0.020%.

conclusionsThe use of CPT codes as an indicator of MTM service provision resulted in far lower MTM utilization rates than in published literature. Reliance on CPT codes to identify MTM services in administrative claims is not recommended, given that it limited the researchers' ability to properly identify patient receipt of such services. More accurate methodologies are warranted for identifying MTM use and its effects on patient outcomes. DISCLOSURES: This work was supported by Pharmacy Quality Alliance; Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co. (Kenilworth, NJ); and SinfoniaRx. The funding sources had no role in study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, writing the report, or decision to submit the article for publication. Tate, Chinthammit, and Campbell completed this work during their employment at the University of Arizona. Pickering was an employee of Pharmacy Quality Alliance at the time of this study. Black is employed by Merck. Axon reports grants from the Arizona Department of Health Services and the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy; Campbell reports a grant from the Community Pharmacy Foundation; Chinthammit reports fees from Eli Lilly; Black has received a grant from Merck; Warholak reports grants from the Arizona Department of Health Services and Novartis, all unrelated to this study. Taylor reports grants from Tabula Rasa Op-Co, during the conduct of the study, and from the Arizona Department of Health Services, outside the conduct of this study. This research was accepted as a poster presentation at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Annual Meeting, May 16-20, 2020, in Orlando, FL, but was not presented due to the COVID-19 pandemic. An abstract was published in

Indexed as

Current Procedural TerminologyData CollectionHumansInsurance, Health, ReimbursementMedicare Part DMedication Therapy ManagementRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32996390
PMCPMC10391033
OpenAlexW3090245876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.