Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32996386›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2020

Perceptions of the Value of Clinical Pharmacy Medication Review for Women During Early Pregnancy.

Minna Lee, Deanna Kurz, Sarah Schwiesow, Thomas Delate, Stephanie Campbell, Kara Rivera, Kari Olson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Minna LeeCase Management Department, Sutter Health Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sunnyvale, California.
Deanna KurzPharmacy Department, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora.
Sarah SchwiesowPharmacy Department, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora.
Thomas DelateDrug Use Management, Kaiser Permanente National Pharmacy, Aurora, Colorado, and Clinical Pharmacy Department, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Stephanie CampbellPharmacy Department, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, and Clinical Pharmacy Department, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Kara RiveraPharmacy Department, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora.
Kari OlsonPharmacy Department, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora; Drug Use Management, Kaiser Permanente National Pharmacy, Aurora; and Clinical Pharmacy Department, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Kaiser Permanente · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefit of continuing medications to prevent or treat illness is often overlooked, since pregnant women tend to overestimate the teratogenic risk of medications. Pharmacists can serve as a resource to prescribers and pregnant women with their knowledge of the appropriate use and management of medications during pregnancy. Little information exists on the value women place on pharmacists' medication management during pregnancy.

objectiveTo assess pregnant women's perceptions of an ambulatory care clinical pharmacist (CP) medication review service during early pregnancy that provided education regarding the risks and benefits of medication use during pregnancy.

methodsThis was a qualitative study of pregnant women using semistructured telephone interviews performed between December 12, 2018, and January 18, 2019, and conducted in an integrated health care delivery system. Potential participants were identified from CP encounter records. Consented English-speaking women aged ≥ 18 years participated in an up to 30-minute interview within 1 week of the CP encounter. Interviews were professionally transcribed and coded line by line using the constant comparison method with grounded theory used to gain insight into participants' perspectives.

results62 women were invited to participate in semistructured telephone interviews of whom 24 (39%) completed the interview. Three main themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: satisfaction with the service, comfort with medication use during pregnancy, and connectedness to the health care team. Overall, the CP medication review and education service was perceived positively by the participants. Participants reported satisfaction in the quality, timeliness, and convenience of the service and found it beneficial to have their medications reviewed early during pregnancy to assist in medication use decisions before their first obstetric visit.

conclusionsCP medication review provided a comforting, valuable service for women during early pregnancy when medication-taking decisions can feel exigent. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Kaiser Permanente. The authors have nothing to disclose. Preliminary results were presented at the Mountain States Conference for Residents and Preceptors, May 2019, in Salt Lake City, UT.

Indexed as

AdultDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansInterviews as TopicMedication Therapy ManagementPatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionPharmaceutical ServicesPharmacistsPregnancyProfessional Role

Identifiers

PMID32996386
PMCPMC10391213
OpenAlexW3089840827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.