ArticleJournal of anatomy2021
A comparative characterization of laryngeal anatomy in the singing mouse.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Vocal repertoire expansion in singing mice by co-opting a conserved midbrain circuit node.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
- Developmental trajectories in laryngeal anatomy of California mice (Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Nonlinear phenomena in animal vocalizations: do they reflect alternative functional modes of voice control, 'leaked' cues to quality or condition, or both?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- De novo assembly and annotation of the singing mouse genome.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- A comparative characterization of laryngeal anatomy in the singing mouse.Journal of anatomy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sexual displays are some of the most dramatic and varied behaviors that have been documented. The elaboration of such behaviors often relies on the modification of existing morphology. To understand how display elaboration arises, we analyzed the laryngeal anatomy of three species of mice that vary in the presence and complexity of their vocal displays. Mice and rats have a specialized larynx that enables them to produce both low-frequency "audible" sounds, perhaps using vocal fold vibration, as well as distinct mechanisms that are thought to enable higher frequency sounds, such as vocal membrane vibration and intralaryngeal whistles. These mechanisms rely on different structures within the larynx. Using histology, we characterized laryngeal anatomy in Alston's singing mouse (Scotinomys teguina), the northern pygmy mouse (Baiomys taylori), and the laboratory mouse (Mus musculus), which produce different types of vocalizations. We found evidence of a vocal membrane in all species, as well as species differences in vocal fold and ventral pouch size. Presence of a vocal membrane in these three species, which are not known to use vocal membrane vibration, suggests that this structure may be widespread among muroid rodents. An expanded ventral pouch in singing and pygmy mice suggests that these mice may use an intralaryngeal whistle to produce their advertisement songs, and that an expanded ventral pouch may enable lower frequencies than laboratory mouse whistle-produced sounds. Variation in the laryngeal anatomy of rodents fits into a larger pattern across terrestrial vertebrates, where the development and modification of vocal membranes and pouches, or air sacs, are common mechanisms by which vocalizations diversify. Understanding variation in the functional anatomy of relevant organs is the first step in understanding how morphological changes enable novel displays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.