Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32996101›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2020

Laparoscopic Clip Gastroplasty with the BariClip.

Patrick Noel, Imane Eddbali, Marius Nedelcu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05557084 (Laparoscopic Clip-Gastroplasty With The Use Of Bariclip), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05557084 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Laparoscopic Clip-Gastroplasty With The Use Of Bariclip

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of Rome Tor VergataRan2021 to 2022Enrolled50ConditionsObesity, Obesity, Abdominal, SurgeryArmslaparoscopic vertical clip gastroplasty (LVCG) with Bariclip.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrick NoelMediclinic Parkview Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. casanoel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9292-6120
Imane EddbaliEmirates Specialty Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Marius NedelcuELSAN, Clinique Saint Michel, Centre Chirurgical de l'Obésité, Toulon, France.
Dubai Hospital · AEHôpital Saint-Michel · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Having the advantages of the reversibility by clipping and not cutting the stomach, the BariClip procedure reproduces the effect of the SG [1, 2] without adding the risk of leaks, and minimizes the occurrence of postoperative GERD by decreasing the intragastric pressure [3]. We present an edited video on the placement of a BariClip with the main steps of the procedure for a female patient with a BMI 41 kg/sqm. A 36 F bougie is placed to calibrate the size of the pouch. Using a laparoscopic approach, the BariClip is placed into the peritoneal cavity through a 12 mm trocar. The BariClip is then closed around the stomach parallel to the lesser curvature, creating a small medial pouch and an excluded large lateral segment. To prevent slippage (rate is approximately 3%), the BariClip is sutured to the gastric wall both anteriorly and posteriorly at various levels of the stomach, as shown in the video. Despite the possibility to suture on either side of the BariClip, the left indentations are preferred in order to avoid vessels of the lesser curvature which are closer to the right indentations. The recovery was uneventful, and 4 h after the surgery, the patient was tolerating liquids. She was discharged the following day with a prescription of PPI (pantoprazole 40 mg) for 30 days and of clexane 0.4 IM for 5 days. As with most bariatric procedures, she was started on 2 weeks of liquids, followed by 2 weeks of soft diet, before experiencing solid food. At 1 month after surgery, the patient had lost 10% of her TBW, and at 1-year follow-up, she had lost 31% of her TBW. She had no reflux, pain, or any other complaints and was very happy. The closing of the BariClip has been designed to be a low-pressure system, and in addition, it has a wide inferior outlet (2.5 cm), which does not create high intraluminal pressure. Both of these factors result in a low risk of erosion and of GERD. The rate of erosion in the original series was 1.3% with up to a 7-year history of implantation. The most common complication encountered at the beginning of our experience has been a slippage of the BariClip, and with the learning curve, this rate dropped to 3%. The QOL has been studied on a first series of patients and showed good results comparable with those given with the LSG and the RYGB [4]. In conclusion, the BariClip accomplishes almost similar weight loss as a SG, without a gastrectomy, without risks of leaks, and without causing reflux, and at the same ,time the BariClip is reversible [5].

Indexed as

GastroplastyLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidFemaleGastrectomyHumansQuality of LifeStomachSurgical InstrumentsBariClipLaparoscopic BarriSleeveLaparoscopic clip gastroplastyLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomyVideo

Identifiers

PMID32996101
OpenAlexW3089922064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.