Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32996069›Full record

ReviewClinical rheumatology2021

Understanding the paradigm of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.

Diego Benavent, Victoria Navarro-Compán

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A glance into the future of diagnosis and treatment of spondyloarthritis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Secukinumab in axial spondyloarthritis: a narrative review of clinical evidence.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Diego BenaventHospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9119-5330
Victoria Navarro-CompánHospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain. mvictoria.navarroc@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4527-852X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) encompasses both non-radiographic (nr-axSpA) and traditional radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) forms. The former was conceived following the establishment of the ASAS classification criteria for axSpA, which for the first time included the use of magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints. This facilitated the classification of patients with axSpA who did not present substantial structural damage. This conception of nr-axSpA revolutionized the classical understanding of axSpA opening new doors for research and broadening the scope of treatment to the entire spectrum of axSpA. In this sense, epidemiologic patterns of the disease were viewed anew, and early diagnosis became a primary objective in the management of the disease. However, despite these advances, this new axSpA subtype led to some concerns within the scientific community. These issues have been addressed by several studies that set out to clarify the concept of nr-axSpA. In this review, we summarize the findings of the most relevant studies including nr-axSpA and then discuss recent advances in understanding disease clinical patterns, burden of disease, and treatment effects. Current scientific research has shown subtle differences between nr-axSpA and r-axSpA. In the near future, these advances will allow for better management of individual patients across the axSpA spectrum.

Indexed as

SpondylarthritisSpondylitis, AnkylosingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSacroiliac JointDisease characteristicsNon-radiographic axial spondyloarthritisnr-axSpARadiographic progression

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.