Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32995974›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2021

Comparing RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST in advanced melanoma patients treated with pembrolizumab in a phase II clinical trial.

Firas S Ahmed, Laurent Dercle, Gregory V Goldmacher, Hao Yang, Dana Connors, Ying Tang, Sanja Karovic, Binsheng Zhao, Richard D Carvajal, Caroline Robert and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Advancements in Radiomics for Immunotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Firas S AhmedColumbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, PHB-1, New York, NY, 10032, USA. fsa2101@columbia.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9616-9297
Laurent DercleColumbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, PHB-1, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Gregory V GoldmacherMerck & Co. Pharmaceutical, Warrington, PA, USA.
Hao YangColumbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, PHB-1, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Dana ConnorsFoundation for the National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ying TangCCS Associates, San Jose, CA, USA.
Sanja KarovicInova Schar Cancer Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Binsheng ZhaoColumbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, PHB-1, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Richard D CarvajalColumbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, PHB-1, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Caroline RobertGustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Paris, France.
Michael L MaitlandInova Schar Cancer Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Geoffrey R OxnardDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Lawrence H SchwartzColumbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W 168th Street, PHB-1, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USCCS Associates (United States) · USFoundation for the National Institutes of Health · USHarvard University · USInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · US

Funding

Integrating Radiomics into S0819 and Lung-MAP, Biomarker Driven Clinical Trials for Lung CancerU01CA225431 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SCHWARTZ, LAWRENCE H, ZHAO, BINSHENG · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
Computational modeling of tumor burden by CT to advance cancer therapeuticsR01CA194783 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BRUNO, RENE, MAITLAND, MICHAEL L. · 2015 to 2020
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA194783NCI NIH HHS U01 CA225431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare tumor best overall response (BOR) by RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST, to explore the incidence of pseudoprogression in melanoma treated with pembrolizumab, and to assess the impact of pseudoprogression on overall survival (OS).

methodsA total of 221 patients with locally advanced/unresectable melanoma who received pembrolizumab as part of KEYNOTE-002 trial were included in this study. Radiological assessment of imaging was centrally reviewed to assess tumor response. Incidence of discordance in BOR between RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST as well as rate of pseudoprogression were measured. OS of patients with pseudoprogression was compared with that of those with uncontrolled disease.

resultsOf the 221 patients in this cohort, 136 patients developed PD as per RECIST v1.1 and 78 patients with PD continued treatment and imaging beyond initial RECIST 1.1-defined PD. Among the 78 patients who continued therapy and imaging post-progression, RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST were discordant in 10 patients (12.8%) and pseudoprogression was encountered in 14 patients (17.9%). OS of patients with pseudoprogression was longer than that of patients with uncontrolled disease/true progression (29.9 months versus 8.0 months, p value < 0.001).

conclusionsEffectiveness of immunotherapy in clinical trials depends on the criterion used to assess tumor response (RECIST 1.1 vs iRECIST) with iRECIST being more appropriate to detect pseudoprogression and potentially prevent premature termination of effective therapy. Pseudoprogression was associated with improved OS in comparison with that of patients with uncontrolled disease. KEY POINTS: • Discordance between iRECIST and RECIST 1.1 was found in 12.8% of unresectable melanoma patients on pembrolizumab who continued therapy beyond initial RECIST 1.1-defined progression. • Pseudoprogression, captured with iRECIST, occurred in 17.9% and was significantly associated with improved overall survival in comparison with uncontrolled disease.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedMelanomaHumansImmunotherapyResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedpembrolizumabImmunotherapyMelanomaRECIST

Identifiers

PMID32995974
PMCPMC9239312
OpenAlexW3091479370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.