Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32995968›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2020

[Top ten pediatric radiological emergencies].

Katja Glutig, Hans-Joachim Mentzel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katja GlutigInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland. Katja.Glutig@med.uni-jena.de.
Hans-Joachim MentzelInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric emergencies encompass a wide range of different findings. These include injuries to the child's body due to high-energy trauma or abuse, unclear limitations of consciousness and primarily unspecific abdominal or thoracic pain as well as swallowing or inhalation of foreign bodies. Detailed knowledge of the various imaging methods and the correct application are important. This article gives an overview of the significance of imaging techniques for emergency diagnostics in childhood and adolescence.

Indexed as

Child AbuseForeign BodiesRadiographyWounds and InjuriesAdolescentChildEmergenciesEmergency Service, HospitalHumansChest/stomach painForeign bodiesImpaired consciousnessPediatricsWounds and injuries

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.