Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32995935›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2020

[Acoustic neuromas : Differential diagnoses].

J Mohamad, A Simgen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J MohamadKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Straße 1, 66424, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland. josef.mohamad@uks.eu.
A Simgen
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical issueAcoustic neuromas in adults are the most common infratentorial tumors that originate from the Schwann's cells of the vestibular part of the eighth cranial nerve and are clinically noticeable through neurological deficits, such as unilateral hypoacusis, tinnitus, dizziness and unilateral facial nerve palsy. Due to the widespread use of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), acoustic neuromas can now be diagnosed with a high rate of sensitivity and specificity; however, there are a number of possible differential diagnoses, such as meningioma, epidermoid and metastases as well as a number of less common diagnoses, such as peripheral nerve sheath tumors, sarcoidosis/neuritis and lipomas, which are sometimes difficult to distinguish from acoustic neuromas. Particularly smaller findings can often only be differentiated with the aid of a histopathological investigation. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Small intrameatal and asymptomatic acoustic neuromas, some of which are discovered as incidental findings, do not require immediate treatment and should instead be monitored by MRI. Larger findings that are symptomatic and thus cause a number of severe neurological symptoms that are stressful for the patient, should be surgically removed. In cases where surgical treatment is not possible or for smaller symptomatic findings, radiotherapy can also be considered as an alternative.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaNeuroma, AcousticAdultDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrain metastasisEpidermoidInfratentorial tumorMeningiomaPeripheral nerve sheath tumor

Identifiers

PMID32995935
OpenAlexW3089502502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.