Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32995916›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2021

Pedicled vascularized bone grafts compared with xenografts in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion.

S Matić, Č Vučković, A Lešić, I Glišović Jovanović, D Polojac, S Dučić, M Bumbaširević

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgical treatment of carpal scaphoid non-union: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Treatment of scaphoid fractures and pseudarthroses with the human allogeneic cortical bone screw. A multicentric retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S MatićClinical Center of Serbia, Orthopedic and Traumatology University Clinic, Belgrade, Serbia.
Č VučkovićClinical Center of Serbia, Orthopedic and Traumatology University Clinic, Belgrade, Serbia.
A LešićClinical Center of Serbia, Orthopedic and Traumatology University Clinic, Belgrade, Serbia.
I Glišović JovanovićClinical Center of Serbia, Orthopedic and Traumatology University Clinic, Belgrade, Serbia. ivanaglisa@gmail.com.
D PolojacClinical Center of Serbia, Orthopedic and Traumatology University Clinic, Belgrade, Serbia.
S DučićSchool of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
M BumbaširevićClinical Center of Serbia, Orthopedic and Traumatology University Clinic, Belgrade, Serbia.
University of Belgrade · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFractures of the scaphoid account for 60-70% of all wrist bone fractures. The results of treatment in terms of bone healing vary depending on the type and location of the fracture, the time elapsed since the injury, the type of surgical treatment. Nonunion occurs in 5-15% of the cases on average. The purpose of this paper is to compare the surgical techniques and results of treating scaphoid nonunion (SNU) with osteoplastic xenografts of bovine origin or a vascularized autograft of the distal part of the dorsal radius.

methodsWe compare two groups of patients with symptomatic SNU, treated surgically with either a vascularized graft (n = 15) or a xenograft of bovine origin (n = 15). In the presurgical stage, the demographic characteristics of the patients, the time elapsed between injury and surgery, and classification of the injury (Schonberg, Herbert-Fisher, and Geissler-Slade) were recorded. One year following surgery, bone healing, total duration of the treatment, complications, the Mayo wrist score, and answers to the DASH questionnaire were analyzed.

resultsNo statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients were observed for bone healing (86.7% vs 80%) or functional results. A highly significant difference was observed with respect to duration of the surgical intervention in favor of xenografts.

conclusionThe xenograft method is simple and relatively acceptable, providing good results in terms of healing and functionality.

Indexed as

Fractures, UnunitedScaphoid BoneAnimalsBone TransplantationCattleFracture Fixation, InternalHeterograftsHumansRadiusBone graftingScaphoid nonunionVascularized bone graftXenograft

Identifiers

PMID32995916
OpenAlexW3091056053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.