ArticleCJC open2020
Optimal Usage of Sacubitril/Valsartan for the Treatment of Heart Failure: The Importance of Optimizing Heart Failure Care in Canada.
Article in CJC open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Historical Drug Costs Among Elderly Patients Hospitalized with Heart Failure in Canada, 2013-2014 to 2018-2019.CJC open · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Evaluating the quality of care for heart failure hospitalizations in inflammatory arthritis - A population-based cohort study.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
- The Canadian Heart Failure (CAN-HF) Registry: A Canadian Multicentre, Retrospective Study of Outpatients with Heart Failure.CJC open · 2025Article
- Use of Sacubitril/Valsartan Prior to Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation.CJC open · 2023Article
- Article
- The Canadian Heart Failure (CAN-HF) Registry: A Canadian Multicentre, Retrospective Study of Inpatients With Heart Failure.CJC open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction represents approximately 50% of the 600,000 Canadians currently living with HF and over 90,000 new cases diagnosed each year. The angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, sacubitril/valsartan, demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization over standard of care therapy.
methodsThe potential magnitude of benefit in Canada with respect to preventing or postponing deaths and reducing hospitalizations resulting from its optimal implementation in patients with HF with an ejection fraction <40% was estimated based on published sources.
resultsOf the potentially eligible 225,562 patients, this would amount to the prevention of 4699 cardiovascular deaths and first HF hospitalizations, 3698 thirty-day HF readmissions, and 2820 deaths due to all-cause mortality. The number of patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan nationally in 2018 was 27,267. This represents approximately 12% of the calculated eligible population for this therapy in Canada.
conclusionsThe findings from this analysis suggest that a substantial number of deaths, hospitalizations, and HF readmissions could potentially be avoided by optimal usage of sacubitril/valsartan therapy in Canada. This emphasizes the importance of rapidly and appropriately implementing evidence-based medications into routine clinical practice, to achieve the best possible outcomes for our patients with HF and to reduce the high burden and cost of HF in Canada.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.