Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32995670›Full record

ReviewBioactive materials2021

Regulatory science for hernia mesh: Current status and future perspectives.

Wenbo Liu, Yajie Xie, Yudong Zheng, Wei He, Kun Qiao, Haoye Meng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioactive materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Design of New Concept of Knitted Hernia Implant.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wenbo LiuSchool of Material Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, 30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Yajie XieSchool of Material Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, 30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Yudong ZhengSchool of Material Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, 30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Wei HeSchool of Material Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, 30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Kun QiaoSchool of Material Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, 30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Haoye MengSchool of Material Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, 30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulatory science for medical devices aims to develop new tools, standards and approaches to assess the safety, effectiveness, quality and performance of medical devices. In the field of biomaterials, hernia mesh is a class of implants that have been successfully translated to clinical applications. With a focus on hernia mesh and its regulatory science system, this paper collected and reviewed information on hernia mesh products and biomaterials in both Chinese and American markets. The current development of regulatory science for hernia mesh, including its regulations, standards, guidance documents and classification, and the scientific evaluation of its safety and effectiveness was first reported. Then the research prospect of regulatory science for hernia mesh was discussed. New methods for the preclinical animal study and new tools for the evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of hernia mesh, such as computational modeling, big data platform and evidence-based research, were assessed. By taking the regulatory science of hernia mesh as a case study, this review provided a research basis for developing a regulatory science system of implantable medical devices, furthering the systematic evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of medical devices for better regulatory decision-making. This was the first article reviewing the regulatory science of hernia mesh and biomaterial-based implants. It also proposed and explained the concepts of evidence-based regulatory science and technical review for the first time.

Indexed as

Hernia meshRegenerationRegulatory scienceRemoldingSafety and effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID32995670
PMCPMC7490592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.