ArticleHeliyon2020
The effects of human platelet lysate versus commercial endothelial growth medium on the endothelial differentiation potential of human amniotic fluid mesenchymal stem cells.
Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differentiation potential of human amniotic fluid derived-mesenchymal stem cells into dopaminergic neurons.Anatomy & cell biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Physiologically-Modeled Dynamic Stimulation and Growth Factors Induce Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells to a Vascular Endothelial Cell Phenotype.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of cryopreserved adipose stem cells expanded in hollow fiber bioreactor versus conventional tissue culture flasks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Functional properties of equine adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells cultured with equine platelet lysate.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To differentiate stem cells into endothelial cells, vascular endothelia growth factors (VEGF) serve as the major signal for stimulating the cells. However, there are other cytokines or growth factors associated with endothelial cell development and differentiation. Human platelet lysate (hPL) has been a promising reagent in cell-based therapy since it is considered as a source of bioactive molecules and growth factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the in vitro differentiation of human amniotic fluid mesenchymal stem cells (hAF-MSCs) into endothelial-like cells under hPL together with VEGF or endothelial cell growth medium 2 (EGM-2), a commercially induced medium. In this study, hAF-MSCs were isolated from human amniotic fluid cells (hAFCs) using the direct adherence method. The cells expressed CD44, CD73, CD90, and HLA-ABC at high levels and expressed Oct-4 (octamer-binding transcription factor 4) at low levels. The cells were negative for CD31, CD34, CD45, CD105 and HLA-DR. This study found that hAF-MSCs induced with hPL and VEGF had the ability to differentiate into endothelial-like cells by presenting endothelial specific markers (vWF, VEGFR2 and eNOS), forming a network-like structure on Matrigel, and producing nitric oxide (NO). This outcome was similar to those of experiments involving EGM-2 induced cells. The present findings indicate that hPL + VEGF can induce hAF-MSCs to express endothelial cell characteristics. Our findings represent an important step forward in the development of a clinically compliant process for the production of endothelial cell-derived hAF-MSCs, and their subsequent testing in future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.