ArticleSynthetic biology (Oxford, England)2017
Chemical reaction networks for computing logarithm.
Article in Synthetic biology (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of persistent signals and its relation to coherent feed-forward loops.Royal Society open science · 2018Article
- Computing Mathematical Functions using DNA via Fractional Coding.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Living cells constantly process information from their living environment. It has recently been shown that a number of cell signaling mechanisms (e.g. G protein-coupled receptor and epidermal growth factor) can be interpreted as computing the logarithm of the ligand concentration. This suggests that logarithm is a fundamental computation primitive in cells. There is also an increasing interest in the synthetic biology community to implement analog computation and computing the logarithm is one such example. The aim of this article is to study how the computation of logarithm can be realized using chemical reaction networks (CRNs). CRNs cannot compute logarithm exactly. A standard method is to use power series or rational function approximation to compute logarithm approximately. Although CRNs can realize these polynomial or rational function computations in a straightforward manner, the issue is that in order to be able to compute logarithm accurately over a large input range, it is necessary to use high-order approximation that results in CRNs with a large number of reactions. This article proposes a novel method to compute logarithm accurately in CRNs while keeping the number of reactions in CRNs low. The proposed method can create CRNs that can compute logarithm to different levels of accuracy by adjusting two design parameters. In this article, we present the chemical reactions required to realize the CRNs for computing logarithm. The key contribution of this article is a novel method to create CRNs that can compute logarithm accurately over a wide input range using only a small number of chemical reactions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.