Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32995475›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2020

QTc evaluation in patients with bundle branch block.

Harilaos Bogossian, Dominik Linz, Jordi Heijman, Nana-Yaw Bimpong-Buta, Dirk Bandorski, Gerrit Frommeyer, Damir Erkapic, Melchior Seyfarth, Markus Zarse, Harry J Crijns

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The SCN5A Gene Is a Predictor of Phenotype Severity in Brugada Syndrome: A Comprehensive Literature Review.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Practical management of drug-induced long QT syndrome].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A predictive model of super response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in short-term period.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. QTc interval measurement in patients with right bundle branch block: A practical method.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Harilaos BogossianDepartment of Cardiology and Rhythmology, Ev. Krankenhaus Hagen, Hagen, Germany.
Dominik LinzDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+) and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Jordi HeijmanDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+) and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Nana-Yaw Bimpong-ButaDepartment of Cardiology and Rhythmology, Ev. Krankenhaus Hagen, Hagen, Germany.
Dirk BandorskiFaculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Gerrit FrommeyerDivision of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Damir ErkapicDiakonie Klinikum Siegen, Department of Cardiology and Electrophysiology, Siegen, Germany.
Melchior SeyfarthDepartment of Cardiology, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Markus ZarseDepartment of Cardiology, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Harry J CrijnsDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+) and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLFernUniversität in Hagen · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DEDiakonie Klinikum Jung-Stilling · DEUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proper measurement of the QT interval on the 12-lead body-surface ECG is challenging in daily practice. Even more difficult is its correct estimation in the presence of repolarization abnormalities, arrhythmias or bundle-branch blocks (BBB). The QT interval results from two parts of the ECG: (1) the QRS complex, describing the excitation of the ventricles and (2) the JT interval, describing the repolarisation of the ventricles. Prolongation of the QRS width - like in the presence of BBB - entails prolongation of the QT interval, making the estimation of the true repolarisation time challenging. The US recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the ECG suggest focusing on the JT interval in presence of BBB. However, in clinical practice physicians have become more familiar with the interpretation of QT-interval measurements than with the interpretation of the JT Interval. In the last decade, a simple formula for the estimation of the "modified QT interval" in the presence of left or right BBB has been developed and evaluated. In this formula, the modified QT interval is calculated by subtracting 50% of the length of the BBB-QRS from the measured QT interval (QT

Indexed as

JT intervalLeft bundle branch blockLong QTQT formulaQT intervalRight bundle branch block

Identifiers

PMID32995475
PMCPMC7509006
OpenAlexW3089332233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.