Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32995469›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2020

Development of a novel cognitive composite outcome to assess therapeutic effects of exercise in the EXERT trial for adults with MCI: The ADAS-Cog-Exec.

Diane M Jacobs, Ronald G Thomas, David P Salmon, Shelia Jin, Howard H Feldman, Carl W Cotman, Laura D Baker, Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study EXERT Study Group, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Diane M JacobsDepartment of Neurosciences University of California San Diego La Jolla California USA.
Ronald G ThomasAlzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study University of California San Diego La Jolla California.
David P SalmonDepartment of Neurosciences University of California San Diego La Jolla California USA.
Shelia JinAlzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study University of California San Diego La Jolla California.
Howard H FeldmanDepartment of Neurosciences University of California San Diego La Jolla California USA.
Carl W CotmanInstitute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders University of California Irvine Irvine California USA.
Laura D BakerDepartment of Internal Medicine-Geriatrics Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.
Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study EXERT Study Group
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of California System · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
RECRUITMENT COREU19AG010483 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FELDMAN, HOWARD · 2013 to 2020
$80.6M
Wake Forest Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG049638 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RAPP, STEPHEN R · 2016 to 2020
$12.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG049638NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIA NIH HHS U19 AG010483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUse of cognitive composites as primary outcome measures is increasingly common in clinical trials of preclinical and prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD). Composite outcomes can decrease intra-individual variability, resulting in improved sensitivity to detect longitudinal change and increased statistical power. We developed a novel composite outcome, the ADAS-Cog-Exec, for use in the EXERT trial-a Phase 3 randomized, controlled, 12-month exercise intervention in mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

methodsThree combinations of cognitive measures selected from the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale version 13 (ADAS-Cog13), tests of executive function, and the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) were created based on previously documented sensitivity to longitudinal change in MCI and to the effects of exercise. Optimally weighted composites of each combination were modeled using data from the ADNI-1 MCI cohort. Ten-fold cross-validation was performed to obtain a bias-corrected mean to standard deviation ratio (MSDR). The cognitive composites were assessed for their sensitivity to detect 12-month change in MCI.

resultsThe MSDR of 12-month change for each of the composite outcomes tested exceeded that of the ADAS-Cog13 total score. The composite with the highest MSDR (MSDR = 0.48) and associated statistical power included scores on ADAS-Cog13 Word Recall, Delayed Word Recall, Orientation, and Number Cancellation subtests; Trail-Making Tests A & B, Digit Symbol Substitution and Category Fluency; and cognitive components of the CDR (Memory, Orientation, Judgement & Problem Solving). DISCUSSION: An optimally weighted cognitive composite measure was identified and validated for use in EXERT. This composite contained selected subtests from the ADAS-Cog13, additional measures of executive function, and box scores for cognitive components of the CDR. Because this composite score demonstrated high sensitivity to longitudinal change in MCI it will be used as the primary outcome measure for the EXERT trial.

Indexed as

aerobic exercise, Alzheimer's disease, cognitioncomposite outcome, mild cognitive impairment, randomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID32995469
PMCPMC7507362
OpenAlexW3089706683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.