ArticleArthroplasty today2020
First Reported Series of Outpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Middle East.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Water-Tight Arthrotomy Joint Closure of Modified Intervastus Approach in Total Knee Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Length of Hospital Stay after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Correlation Study on 1200 Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOutpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is becoming more commonplace in the United States. Alternatively, the current practice in the Middle East involves an inpatient stay of 7-10 days in the hospital after TKA. This study reports the early results of the first reported series of outpatient TKA performed on patients in the Middle East and compares the clinical and functional outcomes with those of patients who underwent inpatient TKA.
methodsEighty-eight patients underwent TKA (inpatient: 44 and outpatient: 44) using the modified intervastus approach in 2 hospitals in the Middle East from 2017 to 2019. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed by recording the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and knee range of motion (ROM) preoperatively, on the day of surgery, and postoperatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months.
resultsTwo patients undergoing outpatient TKA had complications: one patient suffered a periprosthetic fracture on postoperative day 10 after a fall, and the other patient had drainage on postoperative day 5. No complications occurred in the inpatient TKA cohort. There were no significant differences observed in the VAS scores or knee ROM numbers recorded for inpatient and outpatient TKA groups at any of the follow-up periods. Overall, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, VAS, and ROM significantly improved 6 months after surgery compared with preoperative values for both inpatient and outpatient TKA groups.
conclusionsOutpatient TKA was safely implemented when compared with inpatient TKA, with satisfactory results. A total of 2 complications were seen in this study, which we believe are unrelated to the patient's discharge status. The concept of outpatient TKA using the modified intervastus approach was very well accepted by the patients in this study and can potentially be applied safely elsewhere in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.