Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32995357›Full record

ReviewMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development2020

Malte Lenders, Franciska Stappers, Eva Brand

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Biochemical Amenability in Fabry Patients Under Chaperone Therapy-How and When to Test?BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malte LendersInternal Medicine D, Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Rheumatology, and Interdisciplinary Fabry Center Münster (IFAZ), University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Franciska StappersInternal Medicine D, Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Rheumatology, and Interdisciplinary Fabry Center Münster (IFAZ), University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Eva BrandInternal Medicine D, Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Rheumatology, and Interdisciplinary Fabry Center Münster (IFAZ), University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migalastat (1-deoxygalactonojirimycin) is approved for the treatment of Fabry disease (FD) in patients with an amenable mutation. Currently, there are at least 367 amenable and 711 non-amenable mutations known, based on an

Identifiers

PMID32995357
PMCPMC7490640
OpenAlexW3081163622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.