ArticleMethodsX2020
Fabrication of high-quality glass microfluidic devices for bioanalytical and space flight applications.
Article in MethodsX, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaking Barriers: Exploring Neurotransmitters through In Vivo vs. In Vitro Rivalry.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Operation of a programmable microfluidic organic analyzer under microgravity conditions simulating space flight environments.NPJ microgravity · 2023Article
- Droplet microfluidic-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification (dLAMP) for simultaneous quantification of multiple targets.STAR protocols · 2022Article
- PolyJet-Based 3D Printing against Micromolds to Produce Channel Structures for Microchip Electrophoresis.ACS omega · 2022Article
- Article
- Quantitative evaluation of the feasibility of sampling the ice plumes at Enceladus for biomarkers of extraterrestrial life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Theoretical and Experimental Study on Hot-Embossing of Glass-Microprism Array without Online Cooling Process.Micromachines · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microfabricated glass microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis (CE) devices have been utilized in a wide variety of applications over the past thirty years. At the Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory, we are working to further expand this technology by developing analytical instruments to chemically explore our solar system. This effort requires improving the quality and reliability of glass microfabrication through quality control procedures at every stage of design and manufacture. This manuscript provides detailed information on microfabrication technology for the production of high-quality glass microfluidic chips in compliance with industrial standards and space flight instrumentation quality control.•The methodological protocol provided in this paper includes the scope of each step of the manufacturing process, materials and technologies recommended and the specific challenges that often confront the process developer.•Types and sources of fabrication error at every stage have been identified and their solutions have been proposed and verified.•We present robust and rigorous manufacturing and quality control procedures that will assist other researchers in achieving the highest possible quality glass microdevices using the latest apparatus in a routine and reliable fashion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.