Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32995302›Full record

ReviewInternet interventions2020

A systematic review of the dose-response relationship between usage and outcomes of online physical activity weight-loss interventions.

Nicholas Smith, Sam Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Internet interventions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Adherence to digital health interventions: definitions, methods, and open questions].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas SmithSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, McKinnon Building, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Sam LiuSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, McKinnon Building, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.
University of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnline physical activity interventions can be an effective strategy for weight loss. However, there is a lack of systematic reviews examining the relationship between intervention usage (dose) and participants' response to online physical activity interventions for weight loss. It remains unclear whether certain usage metrics (e.g. login frequency, percent of content accessed) would be associated with improvements in behavioral outcomes. Understanding the dose-response relationship for online physical activity interventions for weight loss would be important for designing and evaluating future interventions.

objective1) Review the methods used to assess intervention usage and 2) to explore the association between intervention usage metrics and outcomes for online physical activity interventions for weight-loss.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines to examine the dose-response relationship of online-based interventions targeting physical activity. We used the following keywords: web OR internet OR online OR eHealth AND physical activity OR exercise, AND engagement OR dose OR dose-response OR usage AND obesity OR weight*. Peer-reviewed articles published between 2006 and 2019 were included.

resultsA total of five articles met the inclusion criteria. The mean intervention length was 10 ± 6 months (range 2-30 months). The usage metrics were total number of logins, login frequency, and usage of online tools. All usage metrics reported were found to be related to outcomes in physical activity interventions for weight-loss.

conclusionOur findings suggest that usage metrics for online physical activity interventions for weight-loss included login frequency, login duration, and use of online tools. Increased intervention usage appeared to be associated with an improvement in participant's weight, physical activity behaviors, and intervention retention. Future research should examine innovative ways to maintain intervention usage throughout the intervention.

Indexed as

Dose-responseOnline physical activity interventionSystematic reviewUsageWeight-loss

Identifiers

PMID32995302
PMCPMC7516044
OpenAlexW3082198564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.