ArticleAsian journal of urology2020
Multicenter experience with photoselective vaporization of the prostate on men taking novel oral anticoagulants.
Article in Asian journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Greenlight laser (XPSArab journal of urology · 2023Article
- Mind the Gap: Reporting and Analysis of Sex and Gender in Health Research in Australia, a Cross-Sectional Study.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Operative time comparison of aquablation, greenlight PVP, ThuLEP, GreenLEP, and HoLEP.World journal of urology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePhotoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) is a widely performed surgical procedure for benign prostatic obstruction. This approach has become particular favoured for men on anti-platelet and anticoagulation agents such as clopidogrel and warfarin but there is minimal published experience in the setting of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs). This study was to examine the perioperative outcomes in men on NOACs undergoing PVP, with particular reference to perioperative morbidity.
methodsA retrospective analysis of PVP datasets was undertaken from three centres in Sydney (Australia), Toulouse (France) and Boston (USA). Subjects who had been treated whilst on NOACs without discontinuation or bridging were identified. Perioperative outcomes and treatment parameters were examined and morbidity recorded according to Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification.
resultsThere were a total of 20 subjects who had undergone PVP whilst NOACs had been continued during the perioperative period. The mean age was 77±6.5 years. The mean prostate volume, energy utilization and vaporisation time was 94±56 mL, 301±211 kJ, and 35±21 min respectively. The mean postoperative duration of catheterization and duration of hospitalization was 2.2±2.4 days and 2.4±2.4 days respectively. There was a single episode of urinary tract infection and four subjects required re-catheterisation for non-hematuric retentions.
conclusionsThis study supports the safety of men on NOACs undergoing PVP. Whilst this study represents the largest experience of PVP in these men, larger studies are necessary to confirm the safety of PVP in this group of men undergoing BPH-related surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.