Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32995252›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone oncology2020

Guidance for the assessment and management of prostate cancer treatment-induced bone loss. A consensus position statement from an expert group.

Janet E Brown, Catherine Handforth, Juliet E Compston, William Cross, Nigel Parr, Peter Selby, Steven Wood, Lawrence Drudge-Coates, Jennifer S Walsh, Caroline Mitchell and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Gender bias in shared decision-making among cancer care guidelines: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Bone health in patients with cancer: a SEOM-SEIOMM consensus review of risk factors, assessment strategies, and management approaches.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Management of bone health in cancer survivorship: a systematic review of clinical guidelines.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Janet E BrownAcademic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Catherine HandforthAcademic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Juliet E CompstonDepartment of Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, United Kingdom.
William CrossDepartment of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Nigel ParrDepartment of Urology, Wirral University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Peter SelbyFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
Steven WoodAcademic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Lawrence Drudge-CoatesDepartment of Urology, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Jennifer S WalshAcademic Unit of Bone Metabolism, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Caroline MitchellAcademic Unit of Primary Medical Care, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Fiona J CollinsonLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
Robert E ColemanAcademic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Nicholas JamesInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Roger FrancisInstitute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, United Kingdom.
David M ReidInstitute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Eugene McCloskeyAcademic Unit of Bone Metabolism, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
University of Sheffield · GBKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBWirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CONTEXT AND

objectiveIncidence of prostate cancer (PC) is increasing, but androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and other therapies are substantially improving survival. In this context, careful consideration of skeletal health is required to reduce the risk of treatment-related fragility fractures and their associated morbidity and mortality. This risk is currently not well-managed. ADT causes significant loss of bone mineral density (BMD). In the metastatic setting, systemic treatments (e.g. chemotherapy, abiraterone, enzalutamide) are used alongside ADT and may require concomitant glucocorticoids. Both ADT and glucocorticoids pose significant challenges to skeletal health in a population of patients already likely to have ongoing age-related bone loss and/or comorbid conditions. Current PC guidelines lack specific recommendations for optimising bone health. This guidance presents evidence for assessment and management of bone health in this population, with specific recommendations for clinical practitioners in day-to-day PC management.

methodsStructured meetings of key opinion leaders were integrated with a systematic literature review. Input and endorsement was sought from patients, nursing representatives and specialist societies. SUMMARY OF GUIDANCE: All men starting or continuing long-term ADT should receive lifestyle advice regarding bone health. Calcium/vitamin D supplementation should be offered if required. Fracture risk should be calculated (using the FRAX® tool), with BMD assessment included where feasible. BMD should always be assessed where fracture risk calculated using FRAX® alone is close to the intervention threshold. Intervention should be provided if indicated by local or national guidelines e.g. UK National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) thresholds. Men requiring bone protection therapy should be further assessed (e.g. renal function), with referral to specialist centres if available and offered appropriate treatment to reduce fracture risk. Those near to, but below an intervention threshold, and patients going on to additional systemic therapies (particularly those requiring glucocorticoids), should have FRAX® (including BMD) repeated after 12-18 months. PATIENT SUMMARY: Modern treatments for prostate cancer have led to significant improvements in survival and quality of life. However, some of these treatments may lead to weakening of patient's bones with risk of fracture and it is therefore important to monitor patients' bone health and provide bone protection where needed. This paper provides specific guidance to clinical teams, based on the most recent research evidence, to ensure optimal bone health in their patients.

Indexed as

Fracture riskGuidelinesOsteoporosisProstate cancerSkeletal health

Identifiers

PMID32995252
PMCPMC7516275
OpenAlexW3046375573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.