Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32995015›Full record

ArticleVeterinary record open2020

A survey of biosecurity measures and serological status for bovine viral diarrhoea virus and bovine herpesvirus 1 on dairy cattle farms in north-west and north-east Spain.

Francisco J Villaamil, Ignacio Arnaiz, Alberto Allepuz, Miquel Molins, Mercedes Lazaro, Bibiana Benavides, Sebastián J Moya, Jordi Casal Fabrega, Eduardo Yus, Francisco J Dieguez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary record open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Factors Associated with the Introduction ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Francisco J VillaamilADSG Costa da Morte, A Coruña, Spain.
Ignacio ArnaizSerology, Animal Health and Production Laboratory of Galicia, Lugo, Spain.
Alberto AllepuzDepartment of Helath ans Animal Anatomy, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain.
Miquel MolinsAnimal Health Service, Animal Health Laboratory of Catalonia, Lleida, Spain.
Mercedes LazaroDairy Interprofessional Laboratory of Catalonia, Cabrils, Barcelona, Spain.
Bibiana BenavidesAnimal Health Department, Universidad de Nariño, San Juan de Pasto, Colombia.
Sebastián J MoyaDepartment of Helath ans Animal Anatomy, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain.
Jordi Casal FabregaSanidad y Anatomia Animal, Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Eduardo YusInstitute of Food Analysis and Research, Santiago de Compostela University, Lugo, Spain.
Francisco J DieguezAnimal Production, University of Santiago de Compostela, Lugo, Galicia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3642-481X
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESInstitut Barcelona d'Estudis Internacionals · ESServicio Gallego de Salud · ESUniversitat de Lleida · ESUniversity of Nariño · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiosecurity is a key measure to reduce and prevent the introduction of diseases to farms and minimise spread of diseases within a herd. The aim of the study was to characterise the current application of biosecurity measures on dairy cattle farms in Spain along with their bovine viral diarrhoea and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis status.

methodsData on biosecurity measures for 124 dairy herds were collected using a questionnaire. The sanitary status of these farms for bovine viral diarrhoea and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis was also assessed using antibody ELISA. Data were analysed using multiple correspondence analysis and a two-step cluster analysis.

resultsThree main clusters of farms were identified: clusters 1 and 2 included herds of small and intermediate sizes. These, particularly cluster 1, showed the most deficiencies in the control of vehicles and visitors. However, laboratory tests were always performed on purchased animals. Cluster 3 had the largest herd sizes, with somewhat better biosecurity control of vehicles and visitors. However, farms in this cluster also purchased the most animals, sometimes without testing, and hired external workers more often.

conclusionThe study indicated that, in the study population, there are serious shortcomings in the application of biosecurity measures on dairy farms, exposing them to disease transmission. This survey also highlights regional and herd size-related differences in the implementation of biosecurity. Collecting data is an important first step to identification of specific weaknesses in different farm typologies, and an adequate follow-up is needed to ensure that measures are implemented correctly on farms.

Indexed as

biosecuritybovine herpesvirusbovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV)cattle

Identifiers

PMID32995015
PMCPMC7497555
OpenAlexW3085056468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.