Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32994891›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020

A promising iPS-based single-cell cloning strategy revealing signatures of somatic mutations in heterogeneous normal cells.

Xuexia Miao, Yueying Li, Caihong Zheng, Lifei Wang, Chen Jin, Lei Chen, Shuangli Mi, Weiwei Zhai, Qian-Fei Wang, Jun Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Single-cell cloning and its approaches.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xuexia MiaoKey Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Yueying LiKey Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Caihong ZhengKey Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Lifei WangKey Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Chen JinKey Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Lei ChenKey Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Shuangli MiKey Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Weiwei ZhaiDepartment of Human Genetics, Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 138672, Singapore.
Qian-Fei WangKey Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Jun CaiKey Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell genomics has advanced rapidly as trace-DNA amplification technologies evolved. However, current technologies are subject to a variety of pitfalls such as contamination, uneven genomic coverage, and amplification errors. Even for the "golden" strategy of single stem cell-derived clonal formation, high-fidelity amplification is applicable merely to single stem cells. It's still challenging to accurately define somatic mutations of a single cell in various cell types. Herein, we provided evidence, for the first time, to prove that induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells or iPSC), being a single somatic cell-derived clone, are recording almost identical (>90%) mutational profile of the initial cell progenitor. This finding demonstrates iPS technique, applicable to any cell type, can be utilized as a cell cloning strategy favorable for single-cell genomic amplification. This novel strategy is not limited by cell-type constraints or amplification artifacts, and thus enables our detailed investigation on the characteristics of somatic mutations in heterogeneous normal cells.

Indexed as

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)Single-cell cloningSingle-cell genomicsSomatic mutations

Identifiers

PMID32994891
PMCPMC7493045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.