Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32994658›Full record

ReviewCeramics international2021

Mixed oxide nanotubes in nanomedicine: A dead-end or a bridge to the future?

Masoud Sarraf, Bahman Nasiri-Tabrizi, Chai Hong Yeong, Hamid Reza Madaah Hosseini, Saeed Saber-Samandari, Wan Jefrey Basirun, Takuya Tsuzuki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ceramics international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Special Issue "Applications of Porous Nanotubes".Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Anodic TiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Masoud SarrafCentre of Advanced Materials, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Bahman Nasiri-TabriziSchool of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
Chai Hong YeongSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
Hamid Reza Madaah HosseiniMaterials Science and Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, P.O. Box 11155-9466, Azadi Avenue, Tehran, Iran.
Saeed Saber-SamandariNew Technologies Research Center, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Wan Jefrey BasirunDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Takuya TsuzukiResearch School of Electrical Energy and Materials Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Science, Australian National University, Canberra, 2601, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanomedicine has seen a significant rise in the development of new research tools and clinically functional devices. In this regard, significant advances and new commercial applications are expected in the pharmaceutical and orthopedic industries. For advanced orthopedic implant technologies, appropriate nanoscale surface modifications are highly effective strategies and are widely studied in the literature for improving implant performance. It is well-established that implants with nanotubular surfaces show a drastic improvement in new bone creation and gene expression compared to implants without nanotopography. Nevertheless, the scientific and clinical understanding of mixed oxide nanotubes (MONs) and their potential applications, especially in biomedical applications are still in the early stages of development. This review aims to establish a credible platform for the current and future roles of MONs in nanomedicine, particularly in advanced orthopedic implants. We first introduce the concept of MONs and then discuss the preparation strategies. This is followed by a review of the recent advancement of MONs in biomedical applications, including mineralization abilities, biocompatibility, antibacterial activity, cell culture, and animal testing, as well as clinical possibilities. To conclude, we propose that the combination of nanotubular surface modification with incorporating sensor allows clinicians to precisely record patient data as a critical contributor to evidence-based medicine.

Indexed as

Ag2O NPs, Silver Oxide NanoparticlesAgNPs, Silver NanoparticlesALP, Alkaline PhosphataseAnodizationAPH, Anodization-Cyclic Precalcification-Heat TreatmentBIC, Bone-Implant ContactBioassaysCAGR, Compound Annual Growth RateCT, Computed TomographyDMF, DimethylformamideDMSO, Dimethyl SulfoxideDRI, Drug-Releasing ImplantsE. Coli, Escherichia ColiECs, Endothelial CellsEG, Ethylene GlycolElectrochemistryFA, FormamideFe2+, Ferrous IonFe3+, Ferric IonFe3O4, MagnetiteGEP, Gene Expression ProgrammingGO, Graphene OxideHA, HydroxyapatitehASCs, Human Adipose-Derived Stem CellsHfO2 NTs, Hafnium Oxide NanotubesHObs, Human OsteoblastsIMCs, Intermetallic CompoundsLEDs, Light emitting diodesMEMS, Microelectromechanical SystemsMixed oxide nanotubesMONs, Mixed Oxide NanotubesMOPSO, Multi-Objective Particle Swarm OptimizationMSCs, Mesenchymal Stem CellsNanomedicineNMF, N-methylformamideOPC1, Osteo-Precursor Cell LinePSIs, Patient-Specific ImplantsPVD, Physical Vapor DepositionRF, Radio-FrequencyROS, Radical Oxygen SpeciesS. aureus, Staphylococcus AureusSBF, Simulated Body FluidS. epidermidis, Staphylococcus EpidermidisTiO2 NTs, Titanium Dioxide NanotubesV2O5, Vanadium PentoxideVSMCs, Vascular Smooth Muscle CellsXPS, X-ray Photoelectron SpectroscopyZrO2 NTs, Zirconium Dioxide Nanotubes

Identifiers

PMID32994658
PMCPMC7513735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.