Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32994442›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Uptake and predictors of colonoscopy use in family members not participating in cascade genetic testing for Lynch syndrome.

Donald W Hadley, Dina Eliezer, Yonit Addissie, Andrea Goergen, Sato Ashida, Laura Koehly

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00004210 (Outcomes in Education and Counseling for HNPCC Testing), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00004210 nacompletednot on this map

Outcomes in Education and Counseling for HNPCC Testing

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)Ran2000 to 2011Enrolled900ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsloss of heterozygosity analysis, microsatellite instability analysis, mutation analysis, counseling intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Diagnosis and management of Lynch syndrome.Frontline gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Donald W HadleyOffice of the Clinical Director, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 35 Convent Drive, MSC 3717, Bldg. 35, Room 1B205, Bethesda, MD, 20892-3717, USA. dhadley@mail.nih.gov.
Dina EliezerSocial Networks Methods Section, Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Yonit AddissieSocial Networks Methods Section, Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Andrea GoergenSocial Networks Methods Section, Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sato AshidaDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Laura KoehlySocial Networks Methods Section, Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Institutes of Health · USNational Human Genome Research Institute · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cascade genetic testing provides a method to appropriately focus colonoscopy use in families with Lynch syndrome (LS). However, research suggests that up to two-thirds at risk to inherit LS don't participate. Within the United States, no studies have assessed colonoscopy use within this elusive and high-risk subset. We set forth to (1) document colonoscopy use within those not undergoing genetic testing (NGT) and (2) identify factors associated with completing colonoscopy. Data came from a cross sectional survey of families with molecularly confirmed LS. One hundred seventy-six (176) adults participated; 47 of unknown variant status and 129 with variant status known (59 carriers/70 non-carriers). Despite a high level of awareness of LS (85%) and identical recommendations for colonoscopy, NGT reported significantly lower use of colonoscopy than carriers (47% vs. 73%; p = 0.003). Our results show that perceived risk to develop colon cancer (AOR = 1.99, p < 0.05) and physician recommendations (AOR = 7.64, p < 0.01) are significant predictors of colonoscopy use across all family members controlling for carrier status. Given these findings, health care providers, should assess patients' perceived risk to develop cancer, assist them in adjusting risk perceptions and discuss recommendations for colonoscopy with all members in families with LS.Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT00004210.

Indexed as

AdultColonic NeoplasmsColonoscopyColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHeterozygoteHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID32994442
PMCPMC7525436
OpenAlexW3091084075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.