Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32994388›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

Retrospective Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography with Digital Mammography in Assessing Tumor Size in 668 Cases of Breast Cancer.

Andrzej Lorek, Katarzyna Steinhof-Radwańska, Anna Barczyk-Gutkowska, Wojciech Zarębski, Agnieszka Boratyn-Nowicka, Agnieszka Bobola, Joanna Lorek, Zoran Stojčev

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrzej LorekDepartment of Oncological Surgery, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Katarzyna Steinhof-RadwańskaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Anna Barczyk-GutkowskaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Wojciech ZarębskiDepartment of Oncological Surgery, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Agnieszka Boratyn-NowickaDepartment of Oncology, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Agnieszka BobolaDepartment of Oncology, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Joanna LorekStudent of the Medical Faculty at the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Zoran StojčevDepartment of Oncological Surgery, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Medical University of Silesia · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is digital mammography with contrast agent. This promising new breast imaging method can be used for planning surgical treatment. This study compared CESM versus digital mammography (MG) in evaluating tumor size in breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Comparison of tumor dimensions in CESM, MG, and histopathology was made. The correlation of these data was assessed by histopathological type, biological subtype, grading of the carcinoma, and patient age. RESULTS The average difference in tumor size between CESM and histopathological examination was 5 mm. The differences in size measurement between CESM and MG were significant (p=0.00). The Pearson's linear correlation coefficients of CESM versus HP and MG versus HP were -0.01 (p=0.79) and -0.25 (p=0.00), respectively, indicating no differences between CESM and HP based on the lesion size. A weak negative correlation between those values was observed on MG. No relationship was found between the tumor size in CESM and the biological subtype, carcinoma malignancy degree, or patient age. CONCLUSIONS CESM is a new diagnostic method in breast cancer. The accuracy of measurement of tumor size using CESM is independent of lesion size, but it overestimates the size by 5 mm on average. The difference is not dependent on grading, biological subtype of the carcinoma, or patient age. They concern the histopathological type, and values are significantly greater in pre‑invasive carcinomas.

Indexed as

MammographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsContrast MediaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingRetrospective StudiesContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID32994388
PMCPMC7534504
OpenAlexW3048413701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.