ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020
Dangerous to claim "no clear association" between intergenerational relationships and COVID-19.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intergenerational Ties and COVID-19 Contagion: A Study on European Adults Aged 50 Years and Older Using SHARE Data.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2023Article
- Intergenerational coresidence and the Covid-19 pandemic in the United States.Economics and human biology · 2023Article
- Understanding COVID-19 dynamics and the effects of interventions in the Philippines: A mathematical modelling study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2021Article
- Elevated Jewish Mortality from Coronavirus in England and Wales: An Epidemiological and Demographic Detective Story.Contemporary Jewry · 2021Article
- Can Comorbidity Data Explain Cross-State and Cross-National Difference in COVID-19 Death Rates?Risk management and healthcare policy · 2021Article
- Reply to Dowd et al.: Dangerous to overemphasize the importance of specific COVID-19 risk factors based on (unadjusted) macro-level analyses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.