ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2020
Multilevel Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: Long-Term Outcomes at 3 and 4 Levels.
Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Obesity on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Two-Level Cervical Disc Replacement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of three-level cervical disc arthroplastyJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- The Future of Arthroplasty in the Spine.International journal of spine surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of fusion, arthroplasty and hybrid surgery outcomes in patients with two-level cervical disc disease.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2024Article
- Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: Rationale, Designs, and Results of Randomized Controlled Trials.International journal of spine surgery · 2024Article
- The Role of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in Elite Athletes.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2023Review
- Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Axial Neck Pain: Comparison of Outcomes to 2 Other Common Cervical Conditions.International journal of spine surgery · 2021Article
- Investigational Research: Timeline, Trials, and Future Directions of Spinal Disc Arthroplasty.Cureus · 2021Review
- Patient Selection in Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.International journal of spine surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultilevel cervical degenerative disc disease in 2 or more segments poses treatment challenges. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is a viable treatment option, but one with high rates of adjacent segment disease and pseudoarthrosis. Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of 1- and 2-level cervical pathology, with established long-term safety and effectiveness. Limited evidence exists for CDA at more than 2 levels. This study investigates the long-term outcomes of 3- and 4-level CDA out to 7 years.
methodsIn a retrospective review of prospectively collected data, patient demographics and surgical characteristics were collected. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter, including: Neck Disability Index (NDI), numeric rating scales for neck pain and arm pain, the Veterans Rand 12-item Health Survey physical component summary (PCS) score and mental component summary (MCS) score, and patient satisfaction scores. Secondary surgery data were also collected. Predictive methods using mixed-effects regression models were used to analyze the data.
resultsData for 139 CDAs were available for evaluation (n = 116 three-level and n = 23 four-level). Statistical improvement was shown for all PRO scores at all postoperative intervals (
conclusionStatistical improvement in PROs, with a low rate of secondary surgeries out to 7 years, demonstrates that 3- and 4-level CDA may be performed safely and effectively in appropriately selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.