Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32994243›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Designing a comprehensive behaviour change intervention to promote and monitor exclusive use of liquefied petroleum gas stoves for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial.

Kendra N Williams, Lisa M Thompson, Zoe Sakas, Mayari Hengstermann, Ashlinn Quinn, Anaité Díaz-Artiga, Gurusamy Thangavel, Elisa Puzzolo, Ghislaine Rosa, Kalpana Balakrishnan and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02944682 (Household Air Pollution and Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02944682 nacompletednot on this map

Household Air Pollution and Health: A Multi-country LPG Intervention Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorEmory UniversityRan2017 to 2025Enrolled3,640ConditionsInfant, Low Birth WeightArmsLiquefied petroleum gas (LPG) cookstove
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Kendra N WilliamsDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA kendra.williams@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9697-048X
Lisa M ThompsonNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Zoe SakasDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Mayari HengstermannCentro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Ashlinn QuinnFogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Anaité Díaz-ArtigaCentro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Gurusamy ThangavelDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, Sri Ramachandra Institute for Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.
Elisa PuzzoloDepartment of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ghislaine RosaDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Kalpana BalakrishnanDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, Sri Ramachandra Institute for Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.
Jennifer PeelDepartment of Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
William CheckleyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Thomas F ClasenRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
J Jaime MirandaCRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-4738-5468
Joshua P RosenthalFogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Steven A HarveyDepartment of International Health, Social and Behavioral Interventions, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial Investigators
HAPIN Investigators

Funding

Household Air Pollution and Health: A Multi-Country LPG Intervention TrialUM1HL134590 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CHECKLEY, WILLIAM, CLASEN, THOMAS F · 2016 to 2021
$31.1M
Pilot Project ProgramP30ES019776 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI William Michael Caudle · 2013 to 2026
$22.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS UM1 HL134590NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES019776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIncreasing use of cleaner fuels, such as liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), and abandonment of solid fuels is key to reducing household air pollution and realising potential health improvements in low-income countries. However, achieving exclusive LPG use in households unaccustomed to this type of fuel, used in combination with a new stove technology, requires substantial behaviour change. We conducted theory-grounded formative research to identify contextual factors influencing cooking fuel choice to guide the development of behavioural strategies for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial. The HAPIN trial will assess the impact of exclusive LPG use on air pollution exposure and health of pregnant women, older adult women, and infants under 1 year of age in Guatemala, India, Peru, and Rwanda.

methodsUsing the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) framework and Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) to guide formative research, we conducted in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, observations, key informant interviews and pilot studies to identify key influencers of cooking behaviours in the four countries. We used these findings to develop behavioural strategies likely to achieve exclusive LPG use in the HAPIN trial.

resultsWe identified nine potential influencers of exclusive LPG use, including perceived disadvantages of solid fuels, family preferences, cookware, traditional foods, non-food-related cooking, heating needs, LPG awareness, safety and cost and availability of fuel. Mapping formative findings onto the theoretical frameworks, behavioural strategies for achieving exclusive LPG use in each research site included free fuel deliveries, locally acceptable stoves and equipment, hands-on training and printed materials and videos emphasising relevant messages. In the HAPIN trial, we will monitor and reinforce exclusive LPG use through temperature data loggers, LPG fuel delivery tracking, in-home observations and behavioural reinforcement visits.

conclusionOur formative research and behavioural strategies can inform the development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of theory-informed strategies to promote exclusive LPG use in future stove programmes and research studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02944682, Pre-results.

Indexed as

Air PollutionAir Pollution, IndoorPetroleumAgedCookingFemaleGuatemalaHumansIndiaInfantPeruPregnancyRwandaPetroleumcommunity child healthpublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID32994243
PMCPMC7526279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.