Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32994228›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2020

Using critical information to strengthen pandemic preparedness: the role of national public health agencies.

Mishal S Khan, Osman Dar, Ngozi A Erondu, Afifah Rahman-Shepherd, Lara Hollmann, Chikwe Ihekweazu, Okechukwu Ukandu, Emmanuel Agogo, Aamer Ikram, Tayyab Razi Rathore and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mishal S KhanGlobal Health Programme, Chatham House, London, UK mishal.khan@lshtm.ac.uk.
Osman DarPublic Health England, London, UK.
Ngozi A EronduGlobal Health Programme, Chatham House, London, UK.
Afifah Rahman-ShepherdGlobal Health Programme, Chatham House, London, UK.
Lara HollmannGlobal Health Programme, Chatham House, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5500-8275
Chikwe IhekweazuNigeria Centre for Disease Control, Abuja, Nigeria.
Okechukwu UkanduNigeria Centre for Disease Control, Abuja, Nigeria.
Emmanuel AgogoNigeria Centre for Disease Control, Abuja, Nigeria.
Aamer IkramNational Institute of Health, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Tayyab Razi RathoreNational Institute of Health, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Ebere OkerekePublic Health England, London, UK.
Neil SquiresPublic Health England, London, UK.
Chatham House · GBNigeria Centre for Disease Control · NGPublic Health England · GBNational Institute of Health · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 has demonstrated that most countries' public health systems and capacities are insufficiently prepared to prevent a localised infectious disease outbreak from spreading. Strengthening national preparedness requires National Public Health Institutes (NPHIs), or their equivalent, to overcome practical challenges affecting timely access to, and use of, data that is critical to preparedness. Our situational analysis in collaboration with NPHIs in three countries-Ethiopia, Nigeria and Pakistan-characterises these challenges. Our findings indicate that NPHIs' role necessitates collection and analysis of data from multiple sources that do not routinely share data with public health authorities. Since initiating requests for access to new data sources can be a lengthy process, it is essential that NPHIs are routinely monitoring a broad set of priority indicators that are selected to reflect the country-specific context. NPHIs must also have the authority to be able to request rapid sharing of data from public and private sector organisations during health emergencies and to access additional human and financial resources during disease outbreaks. Finally, timely, transparent and informative communication of synthesised data from NPHIs will facilitate sustained data sharing with NPHIs from external organisations. These actions identified by our analysis will support the availability of robust information systems that allow relevant data to be collected, shared and analysed by NPHIs sufficiently rapidly to inform a timely local response to infectious disease outbreaks in the future.

Indexed as

Access to InformationPublic Health PracticeBetacoronavirusCommunicable Disease ControlCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Disaster PlanningDisease OutbreaksEthiopiaHumansNigeriaPakistanPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2health policyhealth systemsprevention strategiespublic health

Identifiers

PMID32994228
PMCPMC7526302
OpenAlexW3090213269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.