Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32994144›Full record

ArticleWomen and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives2021

The impact of planning for COVID-19 on private practising midwives in Australia.

Caroline S E Homer, Miranda Davies-Tuck, Hannah G Dahlen, Vanessa L Scarf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain: Experiences of Midwives on the Healthcare Frontline.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Caroline S E HomerMaternal, Childand Adolescent Program, Burnet Institute, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: Caroline.homer@burnet.edu.au.
Miranda Davies-TuckThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: https://www.twitter.com/DaviesTuck.
Hannah G DahlenSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: https://www.twitter.com/hannahdahlen.
Vanessa L ScarfCentre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: https://www.twitter.com/vscarf.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problemThe COVID-19 pandemic response has required planning for the safe provision of care. In Australia, privately practising midwives are an important group to consider as they often struggle for acceptance by the health system.

backgroundThere are around 200 Endorsed Midwives eligible to practice privately in Australia (privately practising midwives) who provide provide the full continuum of midwifery care.

aimTo explore the experience of PPMs in relation to the response to planning for the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsAn online survey was distributed through social media and personal networks to privately practising midwives in Australia in April 2020.

resultsOne hundred and three privately practising midwives responded to the survey. The majority (82%) felt very, or well informed, though nearly half indicated they would value specifically tailored information especially from professional bodies. One third (35%) felt prepared regarding PPE but many lacked masks, gowns and gloves, hand sanitiser and disinfectant. Sixty four percent acquired PPE through social media community sharing sites, online orders, hardware stores or made masks. Sixty-eight percent of those with collaborative arrangements with local hospitals reported a lack of support and were unable to support women who needed transfer to hospital. The majority (93%) reported an increase in the number of enquiries relating to homebirth.

conclusionPrivately practising midwives were resourceful, sought out information and were prepared. Support from the hospital sector was not always present. Lessons need to be learned especially in terms of integration, support, education and being included as part of the broader health system.

Indexed as

COVID-19Private PracticeAdultAustraliaDelivery of Health CareFemaleHome ChildbirthHumansMaternal Health ServicesMidwiferyNurse MidwivesPandemicsPregnancySARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCommunityCOVID-19HomebirthMidwivesPPEPrivately practising

Identifiers

PMID32994144
PMCPMC7510523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.