Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32993778›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2020

Epidemiology and genotyping of Anaplasma marginale and co-infection with piroplasms and other Anaplasmataceae in cattle and buffaloes from Egypt.

Amira Al-Hosary, Cristian Răileanu, Oliver Tauchmann, Susanne Fischer, Ard M Nijhof, Cornelia Silaghi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular detection ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Molecular prevalence ofVeterinary world · 2023
    Article
  15. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Molecular detection and characterization ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  17. Residue Depletion of Imidocarb in Bovine Tissues by UPLC-MS/MS.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  18. Tick-borne diseases in Egypt: A one health perspective.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amira Al-HosaryDepartment of Animal Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71526, Egypt.
Cristian RăileanuInstitute of Infectology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Sudufer 10, 17493, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.
Oliver TauchmannInstitute of Infectology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Sudufer 10, 17493, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.
Susanne FischerInstitute of Infectology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Sudufer 10, 17493, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.
Ard M NijhofFreie Universität Berlin, Institute of Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Berlin, 14163, Germany.
Cornelia SilaghiInstitute of Infectology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Sudufer 10, 17493, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany. cornelia.silaghi@fli.de.
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SE862/2-1Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst 57397533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnaplasma marginale is an obligate intracellular bacterium and the main cause of bovine anaplasmosis in tropical and subtropical regions. In Egypt, data regarding the prevalence of A. marginale in ruminant hosts and of the circulating genotypes is lacking. This study therefore aimed to (i) investigate the presence, epidemiology and genotypes of A. marginale in cattle and buffaloes in Egypt, (ii) to evaluate suitable diagnostic tools and (iii) to identify co-infections of A. marginale with other selected tick-borne pathogens.

methodsBlood samples were collected from 394 animals (309 cattle and 85 buffaloes) from three different areas in Egypt. For the detection of A. marginale infection, several tests were compared for their sensitivity and specificity: blood smear analysis, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), PCR, real-time PCR and reverse line blot (RLB) assay. Co-infections with A. marginale, piroplasms and other Anaplasmataceae were surveyed by RLB while A. marginale genotypes were identified by amplifying and sequencing the partial msp1α gene.

resultsAnaplasma marginale DNA was amplified by qPCR in 68.3% of cattle and 29.4% of buffaloes. RLB showed infection with A. marginale in 50.2% of cattle and 42.5% of buffaloes. Blood smear analysis detected this agent in 16.2% of cattle and 2.4% of buffaloes. ELISA showed specific antibodies against A. marginale in 54.9% of cattle. Anaplasma marginale was associated, in cattle and buffaloes, with several tick-borne pathogens (Theileria annulata, Babesia bovis, Babesia bigemina, Babesia occultans and Anaplasma platys). A significant difference of A. marginale infection level was noticed in cattle, where animals between 3-5-years-old had a higher prevalence (79.2%) compared to those older than 5 years (36.4%) and younger than 3 years (59.7%) and one year (64.5%), respectively (P = 0.002281). Microsatellite analysis identified 15 different genotypes.

conclusionsThe epidemiological findings revealed high prevalence of A. marginale in cattle and buffaloes in all the investigated areas. The circulation of diverse genotypes was observed, most of these A. marginale genotypes being specific for Egypt. The qPCR assay was confirmed to be the most sensitive tool for detection of A. marginale in cattle and buffaloes even in the carrier state, highlighting the importance of using suitable diagnostic tests.

Indexed as

Anaplasma marginaleAnaplasmataceaeAnaplasmataceae InfectionsAnaplasmosisAnimalsBuffaloesCattleCattle DiseasesCoinfectionEgyptGenotypeMalePhylogenyAnaplasma marginaleBuffaloesCattleCo-infectionsDiagnostic toolsEgyptGenotypes

Identifiers

PMID32993778
PMCPMC7526245
OpenAlexW3090515905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.