Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32993713›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2020

Costing the implementation of public health interventions in resource-limited settings: a conceptual framework.

Hojoon Sohn, Austin Tucker, Olivia Ferguson, Isabella Gomes, David Dowdy

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
19.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hojoon SohnDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street E6531, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. hsohn6@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5837-3844
Austin TuckerDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street E6531, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Olivia FergusonDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street E6531, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Isabella GomesDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street E6531, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
David DowdyDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street E6531, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Hotspot versus clinic-based active case finding for TB in Uganda: A pragmatic randomized trialR01HL138728 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI David Wesley Dowdy, Emily A Kendall · 2017 to 2026
$5.4M
Innovative Contact Tracing Strategies for Detecting TB in Mobile Rural and Urban South African PopulationsR01AI147681 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DOWDY, DAVID WESLEY · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Comparative Effectiveness/Implementation of TB Case Finding in Rural South AfricaR01AI116787 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DOWDY, DAVID WESLEY · 2015 to 2019
$3.1M
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US) R01HL138728NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL138728NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI116787NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI147681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFailing to account for the resources required to successfully implement public health interventions can lead to an underestimation of costs and budget impact, optimistic cost-effectiveness estimates, and ultimately a disconnect between published evidence and public health decision-making.

methodsWe developed a conceptual framework for assessing implementation costs. We illustrate the use of this framework with case studies involving interventions for tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS in resource-limited settings.

resultsCosts of implementing public health interventions may be conceptualized as occurring across three phases: design, initiation, and maintenance. In the design phase, activities include developing intervention components and establishing necessary infrastructure (e.g., technology, standard operating procedures). Initiation phase activities include training, initiation of supply chains and quality assurance procedures, and installation of equipment. Implementation costs in the maintenance phase include ongoing technical support, monitoring and evaluation, and troubleshooting unexpected obstacles. Within each phase, implementation costs can be incurred at the site of delivery ("site-specific" costs) or more centrally ("above-service" or "central" costs). For interventions evaluated in the context of research studies, implementation costs should be classified as programmatic, research-related, or shared research/program costs. Purely research-related costs are often excluded from analysis of programmatic implementation.

conclusionsIn evaluating public health interventions in resource-limited settings, accounting for implementation costs enables more realistic estimates of budget impact and cost-effectiveness and provides important insights into program feasibility, scale-up, and sustainability. Assessment of implementation costs should be planned prospectively and performed in a standardized manner to ensure generalizability.

Indexed as

Public HealthCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansCosts of implementationDecision-makingEconomic evaluationImplementation strategiesTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID32993713
PMCPMC7526415
OpenAlexW3090687490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.