Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32993675›Full record

ReviewJournal of translational medicine2020

Credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare: ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective.

Ahmet Erdemir, Lealem Mulugeta, Joy P Ku, Andrew Drach, Marc Horner, Tina M Morrison, Grace C Y Peng, Rajanikanth Vadigepalli, William W Lytton, Jerry G Myers

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical Data for Parametrization ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. AI and innovation in clinical trials.NPJ digital medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Challenges and opportunities in uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmet ErdemirDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biomodeling (CoBi) Core, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue (ND20), Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4629-8055
Lealem MulugetaInSilico Labs LLC, 2617 Bissonnet St. Suite 435, Houston, TX, 77005, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2978-0114
Joy P KuDepartment of Bioengineering, Clark Center, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305-5448, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4785-6044
Andrew DrachOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, 201 E. 24th st, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4211-1254
Marc HornerANSYS, Inc, 1007 Church Street, Suite 250, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2483-5796
Tina M MorrisonDivision of Applied Mechanics, United States Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2317-070X
Grace C Y PengNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging & Bioengineering, Suite 200, MSC 6707 Democracy Blvd5469, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0169-8124
Rajanikanth VadigepalliDepartment of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Daniel Baugh Institute for Functional Genomics/Computational Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, 1020 Locust St, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8405-1037
William W LyttonState University of New York, Kings County Hospital, 450 Clarkson Ave., MSC 31, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3727-2849
Jerry G MyersHuman Research Program, Cross-Cutting Computational Modeling Project, National Aeronautics and Space Administration - John H. Glenn Research Center, 21000 Brookpark Road, Cleveland, OH, 44135, USA. Jerry.G.Myers@nasa.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-9775-4850
Medical Decision Modeling (United States) · USAnsys (United States) · USClark University · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USGlenn Research Center · USNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering · USState University of New York · USThomas Jefferson University · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · US

Funding

Training CoreU54EB020405 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2014 to 2018
$11.6M
Tech-DevelopmentP2CHD065690 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2015 to 2019
$5.4M
Reproducibility in simulation-based prediction of natural knee mechanicsR01EB024573 · NIBIB · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI AHMET ERDEMIR, Jason Halloran · 2017 to 2026
$5.0M
Multiscale Model of the Vagal Outflow to the HeartU01HL133360 · NHLBI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWABER, JAMES, VADIGEPALLI, RAJANIKANTH · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
Modeling Multiscale Control of Liver RegenerationU01EB023224 · NIBIB · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI HOEK, JOANNES B, VADIGEPALLI, RAJANIKANTH · 2017 to 2020
$2.5M
Open Knee(s): Virtual Biomechanical Representations of the Knee JointR01GM104139 · NIGMS · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI ERDEMIR, AHMET · 2013 to 2016
$2.1M
Predicting cell deformation from body level mechanical loadsR01EB009643 · NIBIB · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI ERDEMIR, AHMET · 2009 to 2012
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL133360NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009643NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB024573NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB023224NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020405NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD065690NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complexities of modern biomedicine are rapidly increasing. Thus, modeling and simulation have become increasingly important as a strategy to understand and predict the trajectory of pathophysiology, disease genesis, and disease spread in support of clinical and policy decisions. In such cases, inappropriate or ill-placed trust in the model and simulation outcomes may result in negative outcomes, and hence illustrate the need to formalize the execution and communication of modeling and simulation practices. Although verification and validation have been generally accepted as significant components of a model's credibility, they cannot be assumed to equate to a holistic credible practice, which includes activities that can impact comprehension and in-depth examination inherent in the development and reuse of the models. For the past several years, the Committee on Credible Practice of Modeling and Simulation in Healthcare, an interdisciplinary group seeded from a U.S. interagency initiative, has worked to codify best practices. Here, we provide Ten Rules for credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare developed from a comparative analysis by the Committee's multidisciplinary membership, followed by a large stakeholder community survey. These rules establish a unified conceptual framework for modeling and simulation design, implementation, evaluation, dissemination and usage across the modeling and simulation life-cycle. While biomedical science and clinical care domains have somewhat different requirements and expectations for credible practice, our study converged on rules that would be useful across a broad swath of model types. In brief, the rules are: (1) Define context clearly. (2) Use contextually appropriate data. (3) Evaluate within context. (4) List limitations explicitly. (5) Use version control. (6) Document appropriately. (7) Disseminate broadly. (8) Get independent reviews. (9) Test competing implementations. (10) Conform to standards. Although some of these are common sense guidelines, we have found that many are often missed or misconstrued, even by seasoned practitioners. Computational models are already widely used in basic science to generate new biomedical knowledge. As they penetrate clinical care and healthcare policy, contributing to personalized and precision medicine, clinical safety will require established guidelines for the credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareSimulation TrainingCommunicationComputer SimulationHealth PolicyComputational modelingComputer modelingCredibilityHealthcareReliabilityReproducibilitySimulationValidationVerification

Identifiers

PMID32993675
PMCPMC7526418
OpenAlexW3091749330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.