Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32993644›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Components of antenatal care received by women in fishing communities on Lake Victoria, Uganda; a cross sectional survey.

Ali Ssetaala, Joan Nabawanuka, Gideon Matovu, Nusula Nakiragga, Judith Namugga, Phiona Nalubega, Henry Lutalo Kaluuma, Kundai Chinyenze, Katrina Perehudoff, Kristien Michielsen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Ali SsetaalaUVRI-IAVI HIV Vaccine Program, Entebbe, Uganda. assetaala@iavi.or.ug.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2156-3024
Joan NabawanukaUVRI-IAVI HIV Vaccine Program, Entebbe, Uganda.
Gideon MatovuUVRI-IAVI HIV Vaccine Program, Entebbe, Uganda.
Nusula NakiraggaUVRI-IAVI HIV Vaccine Program, Entebbe, Uganda.
Judith NamuggaUVRI-IAVI HIV Vaccine Program, Entebbe, Uganda.
Phiona NalubegaUVRI-IAVI HIV Vaccine Program, Entebbe, Uganda.
Henry Lutalo KaluumaUVRI-IAVI HIV Vaccine Program, Entebbe, Uganda.
Kundai ChinyenzeIAVI, New York, NY, USA.
Katrina PerehudoffGhent University International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent, Belgium.
Kristien MichielsenGhent University International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent, Belgium.
Bernard BagayaMakerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Matt PriceIAVI, New York, NY, USA.
Noah KiwanukaMakerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Olivier DegommeGhent University International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent, Belgium.
Uganda Virus Research Institute · UGGhent University Hospital · BEInternational AIDS Vaccine Initiative · USMakerere University · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUganda has one of the highest maternal deaths at a ratio of 336 per 100,000 live births. As Uganda strives to achieve sustainable development goals, appropriate antenatal care is key to reduction of maternal mortality. We explored women's reported receipt of seven of the Uganda guidelines components of antenatal care, and associated factors in hard to reach Lake Victoria island fishing communities of Kalangala district.

methodsA cross sectional survey among 486 consenting women aged 15-49 years, who were pregnant at any time in the past 6 months was conducted in 6 island fishing communities of Kalangala district, Uganda, during January-May 2018. Interviewer administered questionnaires, were used to collect data on socio-demographics and receipt of seven of the Uganda guidelines components of antenatal care. Regression modeling was used to determine factors associated with receipt of all seven components.

resultsOver three fifths (65.0%) had at least one ANC visit during current or most recent pregnancy. Fewer than a quarter of women who reported attending care at least four times received all seven ANC components [(23.6%), P < 0.05]. Women who reported receipt of ANC from the mainland were twice as likely to have received all seven components as those who received care from islands (aOR = 1.8; 95% CI:0.9-3.7). Receipt of care from a doctor was associated with thrice likelihood of receiving all components relative to ANC by a midwife or nurse (aOR = 3.2; 95% CI:1.1-9.1).

conclusionsWe observed that the delivery of antenatal care components per Ugandan guidelines is poor in these communities. Cost effective endeavors to improve components of antenatal care received by women are urgently needed. Task shifting some components of ANC to community health workers may improve care in these island communities.

trial registrationPACTR201903906459874 (Retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealth Care SurveysHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyPrenatal CareResidence CharacteristicsUgandaYoung AdultAntenatalcareCommunityComponentsFishingIslandsUgandaWomen

Identifiers

PMID32993644
PMCPMC7526094
OpenAlexW3091016398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.