Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32993641›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Identification of quality gaps in healthcare services using the SERVQUAL instrument and importance-performance analysis in medical intensive care: a prospective study at a medical center in Taiwan.

Shu-Ju Lu, Hsiu-O Kao, Bao-Lin Chang, Shu-Ing Gong, Shu-Mei Liu, Shih-Chi Ku, Jih-Shuin Jerng

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05931809 (Evaluation of the Perception of Quality of Care of Patients Admitted to a Medical-Surgical ICU), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05931809 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Perception of Quality of Care of Patients Admitted to a Medical-Surgical ICU

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Sao DomingosRan2023 to 2023Enrolled200ConditionsCritically IllArmsSerqual tool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shu-Ju LuDepartment of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7 Zhongshan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan.
Hsiu-O KaoDepartment of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7 Zhongshan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan.
Bao-Lin ChangDepartment of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7 Zhongshan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan.
Shu-Ing GongDepartment of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7 Zhongshan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan.
Shu-Mei LiuDepartment of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7 Zhongshan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan.
Shih-Chi KuDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7 Zhongshan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan.
Jih-Shuin JerngDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7 Zhongshan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan. jsjerng@ntu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5324-8523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessing patients' expectations and perceptions of health service delivery is challenging. To understand the service quality in intensive care units (ICUs), we investigated the expected and perceived service quality of ICU care.

methodsWe conducted this study at an ICU of a university-affiliated medical center in Taiwan from April to September 2019. Admitted patients or their family members responded to a questionnaire survey adopted from the SERVQUAL instrument consisting of 22 items in five dimensions. The questionnaire was provided on ICU admission for expectation and before ICU discharge for perception. We analyzed the quality gaps between the surveys and applied important-performance analysis (IPA).

resultsA total of 117 patients were included (62.4% males, average age: 65.9 years, average length of stay: 10.1 days, and 76.9% survival to ICU discharge). The overall weighted mean scores for the surveys were similar (4.57 ± 0.81 and 4.58 ± 0.52, respectively). The 'tangibles' dimension had a higher perception than expectation (3.99 ± 0.55 and 4.31 ± 0.63 for expectation and perception, respectively, p < 0.001). IPA showed that most of the items in 'reliability,' 'responsiveness' and 'assurance' were located in the quadrant of high expectation and high perception, whereas most of the items in 'tangibles' and 'empathy' were located in the quadrant of low expectation and low perception. One item (item 1 for 'tangibles') was found in the quadrant of high expectation and low perception.

conclusionsThe SERVQUAL approach and IPA might provide useful information regarding the feedback by patients and their families for ICU service quality. In most aspects, the performance of the ICU satisfactorily matched the needs perceived by the patients and their families.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCritical CareCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth Care SurveysHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesQuality of Health CareReproducibility of ResultsExpectationsHealth servicesIntensive care unitsPerceptionQuality of health care

Identifiers

PMID32993641
PMCPMC7523493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.