Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32993637›Full record

Trial reportHealth and quality of life outcomes2020

Measurement properties of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in recording self-reported health status in older patients with substantial multimorbidity and polypharmacy.

Arjun Bhadhuri, Paul Kind, Paola Salari, Katharina Tabea Jungo, Benoît Boland, Stephen Byrne, Stefanie Hossmann, Olivia Dalleur, Wilma Knol, Elisavet Moutzouri and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D in populations with a mean age of ≥ 75 years: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Feasibility of the EQ-5D in the elderly population: a systematic review of the literature.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Patient and surgical factors affecting recovery after femur fracture fixation: a secondary analysis of the FLiP trial.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Sensitivity to change of generic preference-based instruments (EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and HUI3) in the context of treatment for people with prescription-type opioid use disorder in Canada.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Analysing the impact of complex multimorbidity on health-related quality of life.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Arjun BhadhuriInstitute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. arjun.bhadhuri@unibas.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1220-0731
Paul KindAcademic Unit for Health Economics, Institute for Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Paola SalariInstitute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Katharina Tabea JungoInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Benoît BolandInstitut de Recherche Santé et Société, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Stephen ByrnePharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Stefanie HossmannCTU Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Olivia DalleurInstitut de Recherche Santé et Société, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Wilma KnolDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Expertise Centre Pharmacotherapy in Old Persons, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Elisavet MoutzouriInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Denis O'MahonyDepartment of Medicine (Geriatrics), School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Kevin D MurphyPharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Linda WisselinkDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Expertise Centre Pharmacotherapy in Old Persons, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Nicolas RodondiInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Matthias SchwenkglenksInstitute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

Horizon 2020 6342388Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation 15.0137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L are two generic health-related quality of life measures, which may be used in clinical and health economic research. They measure impairment in 5 aspects of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in measuring the self-reported health status of older patients with substantial multimorbidity and associated polypharmacy.

methodsBetween 2017 and 2019, we administered EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L to a subset of patients participating in the OPERAM trial at 6 months and 12 months after enrolment. The OPERAM trial is a two-arm multinational cluster randomised controlled trial of structured medication review assisted by a software-based decision support system versus usual pharmaceutical care, for older people (aged ≥ 70 years) with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. In the psychometric analyses, we only included participants who completed the measures in full at 6 and 12 months. We assessed whether responses to the measures were consistent by assessing the proportion of EQ-5D-5L responses, which were 2 or more levels away from that person's EQ-5D-3L response. We also compared the measures in terms of informativity, and discriminant validity and responsiveness relative to the Barthel Index, which measures independence in activities of daily living.

results224 patients (mean age of 77 years; 56% male) were included in the psychometric analyses. Ceiling effects reported with the EQ-5D-5L (22%) were lower than with the EQ-5D-3L (29%). For the mobility item, the EQ-5D-5L demonstrated better informativity (Shannon's evenness index score of 0.86) than the EQ-5D-3L (Shannon's evenness index score of 0.69). Both the 3L and 5L versions of EQ-5D demonstrated good performance in terms of discriminant validity, i.e. (out of all items of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L, the pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression items had the weakest correlation with the Barthel Index. Both the 3L and 5L versions of EQ-5D demonstrated good responsiveness to changes in the Barthel Index.

conclusionBoth EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L demonstrated validity and responsiveness when administered to older adults with substantial multimorbidity and polypharmacy who were able to complete the measures.

Indexed as

MultimorbidityPolypharmacyQuality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32993637
PMCPMC7526382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.