Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32993554›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

A cross-sectional study of the role of men and the knowledge of danger signs during pregnancy in southern Mozambique.

Anna Galle, Malica De Melo, Sally Griffin, Nafissa Osman, Kristien Roelens, Olivier Degomme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna GalleInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, entrance 75, UZP 114, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. anna.galle@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1427-5067
Malica De MeloInternational Centre for Reproductive Health - Mozambique, Rua das Flores No 34, Impasse 1085/87, Maputo, Mozambique.
Sally GriffinInternational Centre for Reproductive Health - Mozambique, Rua das Flores No 34, Impasse 1085/87, Maputo, Mozambique.
Nafissa OsmanInternational Centre for Reproductive Health - Mozambique, Rua das Flores No 34, Impasse 1085/87, Maputo, Mozambique.
Kristien RoelensInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, entrance 75, UZP 114, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Olivier DegommeInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, entrance 75, UZP 114, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of the male partner and wider family in maternal health, especially in case of emergencies, has been receiving increasing attention over the last decade. Qualitative research has highlighted that women depend on others to access high quality maternity care. Currently little is known about these factors in relation to maternal health in Mozambique.

methodsA cross sectional household survey was conducted with men and women in southern Mozambique about decision making, financial support and knowledge of danger signs. A multivariable logistic model was used to identify factors associated with knowledge of danger signs and Cohen's kappa for agreement among couples.

resultsA total of 775 men and women from Marracuene and Manhica districts were interviewed. Maternal health care decisions were frequently made jointly by the couple (32-49%) and financial support was mainly provided by the man (46-80%). Parental and parent-in-law involvement in decision making and financial support was minimal (0-3%). The average number of danger signs respondents knew was 2.05 and no significant difference (p = 0.294) was found between men and women. Communication with the partner was a significant predictor for higher knowledge of danger signs for both men (p = 0.01) and women (p = 0.03). There was very low agreement within couples regarding decision making (p = 0.04), financial support (p = 0.01) and presence at antenatal care consultations (p = 0.001). Results suggest women and men have a high willingness for more male participation in antenatal care, although their understanding of what constitutes this participation is not clear.

conclusionThe study findings highlight the important role men play in decision making and financial support for maternal health care issues. Strengthening male involvement in antenatal care services, by investing in counselling and receiving couples, could help accelerate gains in maternal health in Mozambique. Maternal health care studies should collect more data from men directly as men and women often report different views and behavior regarding maternal health care issues and male involvement.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMaternal HealthObstetric Labor ComplicationsSpousesAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMozambiquePregnancyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32993554
PMCPMC7526108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.