ArticleBMC geriatrics2020
The stability of care preferences following acute illness: a mixed methods prospective cohort study of frail older people.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- How do primary care clinicians approach hospital admission decisions for people in the final year of life? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Palliative medicine · 2024Pooled it
- What really matters to older adults in life and treatment: a qualitative study on the role of connectedness in person-centered care.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- The Incidence of Poor Postoperative Recovery Characterized Using 'Days Alive and Out of Hospital' in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians-A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Patterns of Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences Among Seriously Ill Veterans.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Observational
- Exploring older people's end-of-life care preferences over time: A scoping review.Palliative medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of preoperative frailty on outcomes in patients subjected to emergency laparotomy: a prospective study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Article
- Older people's goals of care in relation to frailty status-the COOP-study.Age and ageing · 2024Article
- Family social support and stability of preferences regarding place of death among older people: a 3-year longitudinal study from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study.Age and ageing · 2022Article
- A phenomenological three-parameter model for predicting the extent of outpatient palliative care.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2021Article
- Games of uncertainty: the participation of older patients with multimorbidity in care planning meetings - a qualitative study.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- End-of-Life Care Preferences of Older Patients with Multimorbidity: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient preferences are integral to person-centred care, but preference stability is poorly understood in older people, who may experience fluctuant illness trajectories with episodes of acute illness. We aimed to describe, and explore influences on the stability of care preferences in frail older people following recent acute illness.
methodsMixed-methods prospective cohort study with dominant qualitative component, parallel data collection and six-month follow up. STUDY POPULATION: age ≥ 65, Rockwood Clinical Frailty score ≥ 5, recent acute illness requiring acute assessment/hospitalisation. Participants rated the importance of six preferences (to extend life, improve quality of life, remain independent, be comfortable, support 'those close to me', and stay out of hospital) at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks using a 0-4 scale, and ranked the most important. A maximum-variation sub-sample additionally contributed serial in-depth qualitative interviews. We described preference stability using frequencies and proportions, and undertook thematic analysis to explore influences on preference stability.
results90/192 (45%) of potential participants consented. 82/90 (91%) answered the baseline questionnaire; median age 84, 63% female. Seventeen undertook qualitative interviews. Most participants consistently rated five of the six preferences as important (range 68-89%). 'Extend life' was rated important by fewer participants (32-43%). Importance ratings were stable in 61-86% of cases. The preference ranked most important was unstable in 82% of participants. Preference stability was supported by five influences: the presence of family support; both positive or negative care experiences; preferences being concordant with underlying values; where there was slowness of recovery from illness; and when preferences linked to long term goals. Preference change was related to changes in health awareness, or life events; if preferences were specific to a particular context, or multiple concurrent preferences existed, these were also more liable to change.
conclusionsPreferences were largely stable following acute illness. Stability was reinforced by care experiences and the presence of family support. Where preferences were unstable, this usually related to changing health awareness. Consideration of these influences during preference elicitation or advance care planning will support delivery of responsive care to meet preferences. Obtaining longer-term data across diverse ethnic groups is needed in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.