Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32992975›Full record

ReviewInsects2020

Butterfly Conservation in China: From Science to Action.

Wen-Ling Wang, Daniel O Suman, Hui-Hong Zhang, Zhen-Bang Xu, Fang-Zhou Ma, Shao-Ji Hu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insects, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Complete mitochondrial genome of the little-known regional endemicMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Complete mitochondrial genomes of two insular races ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The validity of the subspecies,Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wen-Ling WangYunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Transboundary Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China.
Daniel O SumanRosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33149, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3018-8628
Hui-Hong ZhangSchool of Agriculture, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China.
Zhen-Bang XuSchool of Agriculture, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China.
Fang-Zhou MaNanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the P.R.C., Nanjing 210042, China.
Shao-Ji HuYunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Transboundary Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1615-9601

Funding

Biodiversity Conservation Programme of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, China SDZXWJZ01013China-Myanmar Joint Laboratory of Eco-environmental Conservation C176240208National Key R&D Programme of China 2017YFC0505200NSFC Programme of China 41761011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

About 10% of the Earth's butterfly species inhabit the highly diverse ecosystems of China. Important for the ecological, economic, and cultural services they provide, many butterfly species experience threats from land use shifts and climate change. China has recently adopted policies to protect the nation's biodiversity resources. This essay examines the current management of butterflies in China and suggests various easily implementable actions that could improve these conservation efforts. Our recommendations are based on the observations of a transdisciplinary group of entomologists and environmental policy specialists. Our analysis draws on other successful examples around the world that China may wish to consider. China needs to modify its scientific methodologies behind butterfly conservation management: revising the criteria for listing protected species, focusing on umbrella species for broader protection, identifying high priority areas and refugia for conservation, among others. Rural and urban land uses that provide heterogeneous habitats, as well as butterfly host and nectar plants, must be promoted. Butterfly ranching and farming may also provide opportunities for sustainable community development. Many possibilities exist for incorporating observations of citizen scientists into butterfly data collection at broad spatial and temporal scales. Our recommendations further the ten Priority Areas of China's National Biodiversity Conservation Strategy and Action Plan (2011-2030).

Indexed as

agroecosystemsbutterfly ranching and farmingcitizen scienceLepidopterapollinatorprotected speciespublic awarenessrefugiaurban greening

Identifiers

PMID32992975
PMCPMC7600441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.