Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32992945›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Customizable 3D-Printed (Co-)Cultivation Systems for In Vitro Study of Angiogenesis.

Ina G Siller, Niklas-Maximilian Epping, Antonina Lavrentieva, Thomas Scheper, Janina Bahnemann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Comprehensive Look at In Vitro Angiogenesis Image Analysis Software.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ina G SillerInstitute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 5, 30167 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5755-7550
Niklas-Maximilian EppingInstitute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 5, 30167 Hannover, Germany.
Antonina LavrentievaInstitute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 5, 30167 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0003-5572
Thomas ScheperInstitute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 5, 30167 Hannover, Germany.
Janina BahnemannInstitute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 5, 30167 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7008-1673
Leibniz University Hannover · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 346772917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the ever-increasing resolution of 3D printing technology, additive manufacturing is now even used to produce complex devices for laboratory applications. Personalized experimental devices or entire cultivation systems of almost unlimited complexity can potentially be manufactured within hours from start to finish-an enormous potential for experimental parallelization in a highly controllable environment. This study presents customized 3D-printed co-cultivation systems, which qualify for angiogenesis studies. In these systems, endothelial and mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSC) were indirectly co-cultivated-that is, both cell types were physically separated through a rigid, 3D-printed barrier in the middle, while still sharing the same cell culture medium that allows for the exchange of signalling molecules. Biochemical-based cytotoxicity assays initially confirmed that the 3D printing material does not exert any negative effects on cells. Since the material also enables phase contrast and fluorescence microscopy, the behaviour of cells could be observed over the entire cultivation via both. Microscopic observations and subsequent quantitative analysis revealed that endothelial cells form tubular-like structures as angiogenic feature when indirectly co-cultured alongside AD-MSCs in the 3D-printed co-cultivation system. In addition, further 3D-printed devices are also introduced that address different issues and aspire to help in varying experimental setups. Our results mark an important step forward for the integration of customized 3D-printed systems as self-contained test systems or equipment in biomedical applications.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingangiogenesisbiomaterialsbiomedical applicationco-cultivationmammalian cell culture

Identifiers

PMID32992945
PMCPMC7579111
OpenAlexW3088558246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.