Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32992892›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Individual Cerebral Blood Flow Measured by Quantitative Vessel-Flow Phase-Contrast MRI.

Kwang-Hwa Chang, Yuan-Hao Lee, Chia-Yuen Chen, Ming-Fang Lin, Ying Chin Lin, Jyh-Horng Chen, Wing P Chan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kwang-Hwa ChangDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116, Taiwan.
Yuan-Hao LeeDepartment of Radiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2058-3317
Chia-Yuen ChenDepartment of Radiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116, Taiwan.
Ming-Fang LinDepartment of Radiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116, Taiwan.
Ying Chin LinDepartment of Family Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8322-6336
Jyh-Horng ChenDepartment of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Wing P ChanDepartment of Radiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116, Taiwan.
Wan Fang Hospital · TWNational Taiwan University · TWYuanpei University · TW

Funding

Inter-agency Research Fund, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University #107-wf-swf-09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vessel flow quantification by two-dimensional (2D) phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) using a three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) model to measure cerebral blood flow has unclear analytical reliability. The present study aimed to determine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of quantitative vessel-flow PC-MRI and potential factors influencing its consistency. We prospectively recruited 30 Asian participants (aged 20-90 years; 16 women; 22 healthy and 8 stroke patients) for performing 1.5-T MR equipped with a head coil. Each participant was first scanned for time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) images for localization of intracranial arteries. The 2D PC-MRI for each cerebral artery (total 13 arteries in fixed order) was performed twice by two well-trained operators in optimal position. Using the same 3D MRA as a map and facilitated with the non-invasive optimal vessel analysis (NOVA) system, each scan was taken on a plane perpendicular to the target artery. Two consecutive full 13-artery scans were performed at least 15 min apart after participants were removed from the scanner table and then repositioned. A total of four PC flow images obtained from each target artery were transmitted to a workstation facilitated with the NOVA system. Flow data were calculated semi-automatically by the NOVA system after a few simple steps. Two-way mixed-effect models and standard errors of measurements were used. In 13 cerebral arteries, repeatability, using the intra-rater estimate expressed as the average-measures intraclass correlation coefficient, ranged from 0.641 to 0.954, and reproducibility, using the inter-rater estimate, ranged from 0.672 to 0.977. Except in the middle cerebral artery and the distal segment of the anterior cerebral artery, repeatability and reproducibility were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient exceeded 0.8). The use of quantitative vessel-flow PC-MRI is a precise means to measure blood flow in most target cerebral arteries. This was evidenced by inter-rater and intra-rater correlations that were good/excellent, indicating good reproducibility and repeatability.

Indexed as

blood flowmagnetic resonance imagingquantitative imagingrepeatabilityreproducibility

Identifiers

PMID32992892
PMCPMC7601288
OpenAlexW3088895535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.