Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32992838›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2020

An Evaluation of the Implementation of a UK School-Based Running Program.

Anna E Chalkley, Ash C Routen, Jo P Harris, Lorraine A Cale, Trish Gorely, Lauren B Sherar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna E ChalkleySchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE113TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1163-6210
Ash C RoutenDiabetes Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University of Leicester, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK.
Jo P HarrisSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE113TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2675-0833
Lorraine A CaleSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE113TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1485-4499
Trish GorelyDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness IV3 5SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7367-0679
Lauren B SherarSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE113TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9942-5433

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adoption of school-based running programs has rapidly increased over the last five years in the UK and globally. However, there is currently a lack of information on how these initiatives are implemented, and whether they are generalizable and/or sustainable. This study evaluated the implementation (including reach, fidelity, and dose) of a school-based running program over seven months to inform future delivery. This observational study used a mixed-method, single-group, before-and-after design strengthened by multiple interim measurements to evaluate the implementation of an optional school-based running program. Five state-funded primary schools in Leicestershire, UK, participated, with 17 teachers and 189 (81 boys (47.4%) and 90 girls (52.6%)) Year 5 pupils (aged 9-10 years) from eight classes. During the 2016/2017 academic year, data were collected via several measures (including interviews, focus groups, observations, questionnaires, and teacher implementation logs) at multiple levels (i.e., school and individual) and at multiple time points during implementation. Follow up qualitative data were also collected during 2017/2018. The school-based running program achieved good reach, with 100% of pupils opting to participate at some point during the academic year. All schools implemented the program with good fidelity, although the level of implementation varied between schools and over time. The average number of sessions held per week ranged from 0.94-3.89 with the average distance accumulated per pupil per week ranging from 0.02 to 2.91 kilometers and boys being more likely than girls to be classed as high-level participators. Despite an initial drop off in participation over time, all schools remained engaged in the program and continued to implement it until the end of the school year. Contextual features (e.g., staff capacity and resources) differed between schools and influenced the quality of implementation and the frequency of delivery. The school-based running program is simple, inexpensive, and versatile and can be implemented by schools with relative ease. However, schools are diverse settings, with unique challenges to ongoing delivery. Thus, planned adaptations, specific to each school's context, are likely necessary to sustain participation in the longer term and should be considered prior to implementation.

Indexed as

implementationphysical activityprogram evaluationrunningschool children

Identifiers

PMID32992838
PMCPMC7601773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.