Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32992484›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

The Brain-Gut-Microbiome Axis in Psychiatry.

Seung-Ho Jang, Young Sup Woo, Sang-Yeol Lee, Won-Myong Bahk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Imipramine Administration inPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seung-Ho JangDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University, Iksan 54538, Korea.
Young Sup WooDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 07345, Korea.
Sang-Yeol LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University, Iksan 54538, Korea.
Won-Myong BahkDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 07345, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0156-2510

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beginning with the concept of the brain-gut axis, the importance of the interaction between the brain and the gastrointestinal tract has been extended to the microbiome with increasing clinical applications. With the recent development of various techniques for microbiome analysis, the number of relevant preclinical and clinical studies on animals and human subjects has rapidly increased. Various psychotic symptoms affect the intestinal microbiome through the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal gland axis. Conversely, the intestinal microbiome regulates the gastrointestinal tract environment and affects psychological factors by means of the microorganisms or their metabolites, either acting directly on the brain or through the synthesis of various neurotransmitters. This review discusses the clinical applicability of the brain-gut-microbiome axis and directions for improving psychological symptoms based on the studies published to date.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBrainGastrointestinal TractHumansHypothalamo-Hypophyseal SystemMental DisordersNeurotransmitter AgentsPituitary-Adrenal SystemNeurotransmitter Agentsbrain–gut axismicrobiomeneurotransmitterspsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID32992484
PMCPMC7583027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.